Order · Small Claims Tribunal
Machelm v Madge [2021] DIFC SCT 360
A reference record of SCT 360/2021, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.
Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation
At a glance
| Claim number | SCT 360/2021 |
| Court | DIFC Courts — Small Claims Tribunal |
| Decision | Order |
| Before | H.E. Justice Nassir Al Nasser |
| Date | 9 May 2022 |
| Date of issue | 9 May 2022 |
| Operative orders | 2 |
| Numbered paragraphs | 8 |
| Recitals | 3 |
Parties to SCT 360/2021
As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.
| Party | Role |
|---|---|
| Machelm | Claimant/Appellant |
| Madge | Defendant/Respondent |
Decisions in SCT 360/2021
The DIFC Courts have published 2 decisions under this claim number. The dates and types below are the court's own record of the sequence.
| Date | Type |
|---|---|
| 18 April 2022 | Judgment or Order |
| 9 May 2022 | Judgment or Order |
Authorities cited in SCT 360/2021
The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.
Rules of the DIFC Courts applied
RDC 53.91 — see the RDC.
Other decisions of the same division
Records of DIFC Courts decisions heard in the same division around the same time. This decision cites no instrument we hold a record of, so these are listed by division and date rather than by shared authority.
- SCT 129/2016 — (1) Mr Harvey (2) Mrs Halen v Mr Hideki [2016] DIFC SCT 129
- SCT 238/2017 — Hale v Haydee Salon [2017] DIFC SCT 238
- SCT 267/2017 — Holden v Hatisha Recruitment Ltd [2017] DIFC SCT 267
- SCT 165/2017 — Heela Partners Fze v Hyrum [2017] DIFC SCT 165
- SCT 172/2017 — Hera Bank (PJSC) v Herman [2017] DIFC SCT 172
- SCT 231/2017 — Henrietta v Halstead Middle East LLC [2017] DIFC SCT 231
Primary source
Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.
Acting on a small claims tribunal matter
This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question SCT 360/2021 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.