Judgment · Small Claims Tribunal

Holden v Hatisha Recruitment Ltd [2017] DIFC SCT 267

A reference record of SCT 267/2017, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.

Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation

At a glance

Claim numberSCT 267/2017
CourtDIFC Courts — Small Claims Tribunal
DecisionJudgment
BeforeSct Judge Nassir Al Nasser
Date23 November 2017
Date of issue13 November 2017
Operative orders0
Numbered paragraphs0
Recitals3

Parties to SCT 267/2017

As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.

PartyRole
HoldenClaimant
/Counter-Defendant
Hatisha Recruitment LtdDefendant/Counter-Claimant

Sums named in the judgment

These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.

  • AED 390,000
  • AED 26,630.14
  • AED 8,876.71
  • AED 110,958.90
  • AED 135,000
  • AED 1479.45

Authorities cited in SCT 267/2017

The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.

Legislation and practice directions

Records of other DIFC Courts decisions that cite at least one of the same instruments. Shared authority is not shared reasoning — each decision turns on its own facts.

  • SCT 231/2017 — Henrietta v Halstead Middle East LLC [2017] DIFC SCT 231 also cites Employment Law
  • SCT 176/2017 — Halbert v Helentjee [2017] DIFC SCT 176 also cites Employment Law
  • SCT 201/2017 — Harshad v Hena [2017] DIFC SCT 201 also cites Employment Law
  • SCT 120/2017 — Haneul v Hege LLP [2017] DIFC SCT 120 also cites Employment Law
  • SCT 141/2017 — Heitor v Helah [2017] DIFC SCT 141 also cites Employment Law
  • SCT 138/2017 — Halle v Hahn [2017] DIFC SCT 138 also cites Employment Law

Primary source

Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.

  • Holden v Hatisha Recruitment Ltd [2017] DIFC SCT 267 — the decision as published DIFC Courts
  • DIFC Courts judgments & orders — the register this decision is listed in DIFC Courts

Acting on a small claims tribunal matter

This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question SCT 267/2017 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.

Speak to us