Judgment · Small Claims Tribunal
Heela Partners Fze v Hyrum [2017] DIFC SCT 165
A reference record of SCT 165/2017, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.
Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation
At a glance
| Claim number | SCT 165/2017 |
| Court | DIFC Courts — Small Claims Tribunal |
| Decision | Judgment |
| Before | Sct Judge Mariam Deen |
| Date | 17 October 2017 |
| Date of issue | 17 October 2017 |
| Operative orders | 0 |
| Numbered paragraphs | 49 |
| Recitals | 7 |
Parties to SCT 165/2017
As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.
| Party | Role |
|---|---|
| Heela Partners Fze | Claimant |
| Hyrum | Defendant |
Sums named in the judgment
These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.
- GBP 1,998.75
- GBP 3,383.50
- USD 4,353.53
- GBP 1,537.50
- GBP 768.75
- GBP 1,076.25
Other decisions of the same division
Records of DIFC Courts decisions heard in the same division around the same time. This decision cites no instrument we hold a record of, so these are listed by division and date rather than by shared authority.
- SCT 089/2023 — Murkan v Mishti [2023] DIFC SCT 089
- SCT 168/2023 — Mikru v Mako [2023] DIFC SCT 168
- SCT 171/2023 — Marub v Muqat [2023] DIFC SCT 171
- SCT 249/2022 — Mohar v Mrut [2022] DIFC SCT 249
- SCT 097/2024 — Nadia v Neville [2024] DIFC SCT 097
- SCT 139/2023 — Mirtu v Mouni [2023] DIFC SCT 139
Primary source
Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.
Acting on a small claims tribunal matter
This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question SCT 165/2017 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.