Judgment · Small Claims Tribunal

Hale v Haydee Salon [2017] DIFC SCT 238

A reference record of SCT 238/2017, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.

Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation

At a glance

Claim numberSCT 238/2017
CourtDIFC Courts — Small Claims Tribunal
DecisionJudgment
BeforeSct Judge Maha Al Mehairi
Date23 November 2017
Date of issue31 October 2017
Operative orders0
Numbered paragraphs3
Recitals4

Parties to SCT 238/2017

As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.

PartyRole
HaleClaimant
Haydee SalonDefendant

Sums named in the judgment

These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.

  • AED 2,600
  • AED 6,000
  • AED 4,000
  • AED 2,000
  • AED 64,000
  • AED 500,000

Authorities cited in SCT 238/2017

The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.

Legislation and practice directions

Records of other DIFC Courts decisions that cite at least one of the same instruments. Shared authority is not shared reasoning — each decision turns on its own facts.

  • SCT 231/2017 — Henrietta v Halstead Middle East LLC [2017] DIFC SCT 231 also cites DIFC Law No. 4 of 2005
  • SCT 176/2017 — Halbert v Helentjee [2017] DIFC SCT 176 also cites DIFC Law No. 4 of 2005
  • SCT 201/2017 — Harshad v Hena [2017] DIFC SCT 201 also cites DIFC Law No. 4 of 2005
  • SCT 120/2017 — Haneul v Hege LLP [2017] DIFC SCT 120 also cites DIFC Law No. 4 of 2005
  • SCT 138/2017 — Halle v Hahn [2017] DIFC SCT 138 also cites DIFC Law No. 4 of 2005
  • SCT 086/2017 — Halston v Hazel (DIFC Branch) [2017] DIFC SCT 086 also cites DIFC Law No. 4 of 2005

Primary source

Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.

  • Hale v Haydee Salon [2017] DIFC SCT 238 — the decision as published DIFC Courts
  • DIFC Courts judgments & orders — the register this decision is listed in DIFC Courts

Acting on a small claims tribunal matter

This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question SCT 238/2017 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.

Speak to us