Judgment · Small Claims Tribunal

Halston v Hazel (DIFC Branch) [2017] DIFC SCT 086

A reference record of SCT 086/2017, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.

Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation

At a glance

Claim numberSCT 086/2017
CourtDIFC Courts — Small Claims Tribunal
DecisionJudgment
BeforeSct Judge Ayesha Bin Kalban
Date18 May 2017
Date of issue18 May 2017
Operative orders0
Numbered paragraphs23
Recitals4

Parties to SCT 086/2017

As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.

PartyRole
HalstonClaimant
Branch)Defendant

Sums named in the judgment

These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.

  • AED 147,452.71
  • AED 73,726.35
  • USD 40,123.19
  • USD 26,000
  • USD 4,000
  • USD 40,000

Authorities cited in SCT 086/2017

The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.

Legislation and practice directions

Records of other DIFC Courts decisions that cite at least one of the same instruments. Shared authority is not shared reasoning — each decision turns on its own facts.

  • SCT 021/2017 — Hagen v Hannie [2017] DIFC SCT 021 also cites DIFC Law No. 6 of 2004
  • 150/2016 — Haya Spa LLC v Harper Real Estate / Hasan Real Estate [2016] DIFC SC also cites DIFC Law No. 6 of 2004
  • SCT 004/2017 — Hamza v Heidi Law Firm [2017] DIFC SCT 004 also cites DIFC Law No. 6 of 2004
  • SCT 145/2016 — Halsey v Halina DIFC Limited [2016] DIFC SCT 145 also cites DIFC Law No. 6 of 2004
  • SCT XXXX — Hades Property & Infrastructure Consultants LLC v Hadassah Real Esta also cites DIFC Law No. 6 of 2004
  • SCT 086/2016 — George v Gloria Beauty Lounge LLC [2016] DIFC SCT 086 also cites DIFC Law No. 6 of 2004

Primary source

Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.

  • Halston v Hazel (DIFC Branch) [2017] DIFC SCT 086 — the decision as published DIFC Courts
  • DIFC Courts judgments & orders — the register this decision is listed in DIFC Courts

Acting on a small claims tribunal matter

This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question SCT 086/2017 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.

Speak to us