Judgment · Small Claims Tribunal
Haya Spa LLC v Harper Real Estate / Hasan Real Estate [2016] DIFC SCT 150
A reference record of 150/2016, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.
Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation
At a glance
| Claim number | 150/2016 |
| Court | DIFC Courts — Small Claims Tribunal |
| Decision | Judgment |
| Before | Sct Judge Natasha Bakirci |
| Date | 15 February 2017 |
| Date of issue | 15 February 2017 |
| Operative orders | 0 |
| Numbered paragraphs | 152 |
| Recitals | 2 |
Parties to 150/2016
As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.
| Party | Role |
|---|---|
| Spa Llc | Claimant |
| Harper Real Estate / Hasan Real Estate | Defendant |
| ”) (Hereafter, Together Referred To As The “ | Defendants |
Sums named in the judgment
These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.
- AED 194,400
- AED 9,692.83
- AED 160,400
- AED 220,000
- AED 385,500
- AED 419,000
Authorities cited in 150/2016
The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.
Legislation and practice directions
- DIFC Law No. 6 of 2004 DIFC law
- DIFC Law No. 5 of 2005 DIFC law
- DIFC Law No. 7 of 2005 DIFC law
- Contract Law DIFC law
Rules of the DIFC Courts applied
RDC 53.37, RDC 53.48, RDC 53.70 — see the RDC.
Other decisions citing the same authority
Records of other DIFC Courts decisions that cite at least one of the same instruments. Shared authority is not shared reasoning — each decision turns on its own facts.
- SCT 004/2017 — Hamza v Heidi Law Firm [2017] DIFC SCT 004 also cites DIFC Law No. 6 of 2004
- SCT 145/2016 — Halsey v Halina DIFC Limited [2016] DIFC SCT 145 also cites DIFC Law No. 6 of 2004
- SCT XXXX — Hades Property & Infrastructure Consultants LLC v Hadassah Real Esta also cites DIFC Law No. 6 of 2004
- SCT 086/2016 — George v Gloria Beauty Lounge LLC [2016] DIFC SCT 086 also cites DIFC Law No. 6 of 2004
- SCT 120/2016 — Giichi LLC v Glenys [2016] SCT 120 also cites DIFC Law No. 6 of 2004
- XXXX — Gert v Germaine [2016] DIFC SCT 097 also cites DIFC Law No. 6 of 2004
Primary source
Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.
Acting on a small claims tribunal matter
This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question 150/2016 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.