Judgment · Small Claims Tribunal

George v Gloria Beauty Lounge LLC [2016] DIFC SCT 086

A reference record of SCT 086/2016, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.

Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation

At a glance

Claim numberSCT 086/2016
CourtDIFC Courts — Small Claims Tribunal
DecisionJudgment
BeforeSct Judge Natasha Bakirci
Date27 November 2016
Date of issue27 November 2016
Operative orders0
Numbered paragraphs124
Recitals4

Parties to SCT 086/2016

As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.

PartyRole
GeorgeClaimant
Gloria Beauty Lounge Llc (Formerly Known As Gayle Beauty Lounge Llc )Defendant

Sums named in the judgment

These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.

  • AED 41,410
  • AED 30,500
  • AED 15,000
  • AED 7,000
  • AED 4,000
  • AED 76,846

Authorities cited in SCT 086/2016

The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.

Legislation and practice directions

Rules of the DIFC Courts applied

RDC 53.70 — see the RDC.

Records of other DIFC Courts decisions that cite at least one of the same instruments. Shared authority is not shared reasoning — each decision turns on its own facts.

  • SCT 120/2016 — Giichi LLC v Glenys [2016] SCT 120 also cites DIFC Law No. 6 of 2004
  • XXXX — Gert v Germaine [2016] DIFC SCT 097 also cites DIFC Law No. 6 of 2004
  • xxxx — Gilmore Associates Limited v Giulia Limited [2016] DIFC SCT 002 also cites DIFC Law No. 6 of 2004
  • XXXX — Gottlieb LLC v Graca [2016] DIFC SCT 045 also cites DIFC Law No. 6 of 2004
  • SCT 027/2015 — (1) Fergus (2) Ferit v Fidelity [2015] DIFC SCT 027 also cites DIFC Law No. 6 of 2004
  • CA 004/2013 — Hana Al Herz v The Dubai International Financial Centre Authority [2 also cites DIFC Law No. 6 of 2004

Primary source

Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.

  • George v Gloria Beauty Lounge LLC [2016] DIFC SCT 086 — the decision as published DIFC Courts
  • DIFC Courts judgments & orders — the register this decision is listed in DIFC Courts

Acting on a small claims tribunal matter

This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question SCT 086/2016 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.

Speak to us