Reasons For The Order · Small Claims Tribunal
Lihart v Lufant [2022] DIFC SCT 384
A reference record of SCT 384/2022, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.
Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation
At a glance
| Claim number | SCT 384/2022 |
| Court | DIFC Courts — Small Claims Tribunal |
| Decision | Reasons For The Order |
| Before | H.E Justice Nassir Al Nasser Dated 7 November 2022 |
| Date | 8 December 2022 |
| Date of issue | 8 December 2022 |
| Operative orders | 3 |
| Numbered paragraphs | 13 |
| Recitals | 3 |
Parties to SCT 384/2022
As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.
| Party | Role |
|---|---|
| Lihart | Claimant |
| Lufant | Defendant |
Authorities cited in SCT 384/2022
The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.
Legislation and practice directions
- DIFC Law No. 5 of 2005 DIFC law
- Employment Law DIFC law
Other decisions citing the same authority
Records of other DIFC Courts decisions that cite at least one of the same instruments. Shared authority is not shared reasoning — each decision turns on its own facts.
- CA 002/2022 — Expresso Telecom Group Ltd v Tarig H.A.G Rahamtalla [2022] DIFC CA 0 also cites DIFC Law No. 5 of 2005
- CA 009/2020 — CA 009/2020 Mr. Salem Dwela v Damac Park Towers Company Limited also cites DIFC Law No. 5 of 2005
- CFI 054/2020 — CFI 054/2020 (1) Emirates Reit (Ceic) Plc (2) Equitativa (Dubai) Lim also cites DIFC Law No. 5 of 2005
- CFI 037/2019 — Global Advocacy And Legal Counsel v The Industrial Group [2019] DIFC also cites DIFC Law No. 5 of 2005
- SCT 059/2020 — Luciane v The Luterluter Fitness Club Ltd [2020] DIFC SCT 059 also cites DIFC Law No. 5 of 2005
- SCT 368/2018 — Jingal v Jane Fz - LLC [2018] DIFC SCT 368 also cites DIFC Law No. 5 of 2005
Primary source
Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.
Acting on a small claims tribunal matter
This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question SCT 384/2022 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.