Judgment · Court of First Instance

Global Advocacy And Legal Counsel v The Industrial Group [2019] DIFC CFI 037

A reference record of CFI 037/2019, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.

Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation

At a glance

Claim numberCFI 037/2019
CourtDIFC Courts — Court of First Instance
DecisionJudgment
BeforeJustice Roger Giles
Date27 August 2020
Date of issue27 August 2020
Operative orders4
Numbered paragraphs135
Recitals6

Parties to CFI 037/2019

As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.

PartyRole
Global Advocacy And Legal CounselClaimant
/CrossDefendant
The Industrial GroupDefendant/Cross Claimant

Decisions in CFI 037/2019

The DIFC Courts have published 4 decisions under this claim number. The dates and types below are the court's own record of the sequence.

DateType
31 October 2019Order
2 January 2020Order
3 February 2020Order
27 August 2020Judgment

Sums named in the judgment

These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.

  • AED 1,171,916.87
  • AED 1,171
  • AED 1,682,619.18
  • AED 1,109,360.82
  • AED 290,000
  • AED 92,000

Authorities cited in CFI 037/2019

The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.

Legislation and practice directions

Records of other DIFC Courts decisions that cite at least one of the same instruments. Shared authority is not shared reasoning — each decision turns on its own facts.

  • ARB 012/2019 — Limeo Investment & Real Estate LLC v Landia Educational Services S.A also cites DIFC Law No. 6 of 2004
  • SCT 318/2019 — Lexi Consulting (Lana) v Layton [2019] DIFC SCT 318 also cites DIFC Law No. 6 of 2004
  • SCT 368/2018 — Jingal v Jane Fz - LLC [2018] DIFC SCT 368 also cites DIFC Law No. 6 of 2004
  • SCT 105/2017 — Harlow v Hattie [2017] DIFC SCT 105 also cites DIFC Law No. 6 of 2004
  • SCT 083/2017 — Hathai v Hansel [2017] DIFC SCT 083 also cites DIFC Law No. 6 of 2004
  • SCT 086/2017 — Halston v Hazel (DIFC Branch) [2017] DIFC SCT 086 also cites DIFC Law No. 6 of 2004

Primary source

Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.

  • Global Advocacy And Legal Counsel v The Industrial Group [2019] DIFC CFI 037 — the decision as published DIFC Courts
  • DIFC Courts judgments & orders — the register this decision is listed in DIFC Courts

Acting on a court of first instance matter

This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question CFI 037/2019 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.

Speak to us