Judgment · Small Claims Tribunal
Harlow v Hattie [2017] DIFC SCT 105
A reference record of SCT 105/2017, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.
Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation
At a glance
| Claim number | SCT 105/2017 |
| Court | DIFC Courts — Small Claims Tribunal |
| Decision | Judgment |
| Before | Sct Judge Maha Al Mehairi |
| Date | 13 June 2017 |
| Date of issue | 13 June 2017 |
| Operative orders | 0 |
| Numbered paragraphs | 27 |
| Recitals | 2 |
Parties to SCT 105/2017
As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.
| Party | Role |
|---|---|
| Harlow | Claimant |
| Hattie | Defendant |
Sums named in the judgment
These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.
- AED 2,000
- AED 90,000
- AED 5,000
- AED 500,000
Authorities cited in SCT 105/2017
The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.
Legislation and practice directions
- DIFC Law No. 6 of 2004 DIFC law
- Contract Law DIFC law
Other decisions citing the same authority
Records of other DIFC Courts decisions that cite at least one of the same instruments. Shared authority is not shared reasoning — each decision turns on its own facts.
- SCT 083/2017 — Hathai v Hansel [2017] DIFC SCT 083 also cites DIFC Law No. 6 of 2004
- SCT 086/2017 — Halston v Hazel (DIFC Branch) [2017] DIFC SCT 086 also cites DIFC Law No. 6 of 2004
- SCT 021/2017 — Hagen v Hannie [2017] DIFC SCT 021 also cites DIFC Law No. 6 of 2004
- 150/2016 — Haya Spa LLC v Harper Real Estate / Hasan Real Estate [2016] DIFC SC also cites DIFC Law No. 6 of 2004
- SCT 004/2017 — Hamza v Heidi Law Firm [2017] DIFC SCT 004 also cites DIFC Law No. 6 of 2004
- SCT 145/2016 — Halsey v Halina DIFC Limited [2016] DIFC SCT 145 also cites DIFC Law No. 6 of 2004
Primary source
Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.
Acting on a small claims tribunal matter
This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question SCT 105/2017 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.