Judgment · Small Claims Tribunal
Luciane v The Luterluter Fitness Club Ltd [2020] DIFC SCT 059
A reference record of SCT 059/2020, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.
Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation
At a glance
| Claim number | SCT 059/2020 |
| Court | DIFC Courts — Small Claims Tribunal |
| Decision | Judgment |
| Before | Sct Judge And Deputy Registrar Ayesha Bin Kalban |
| Date | 29 April 2020 |
| Date of issue | 29 April 2020 |
| Operative orders | 4 |
| Numbered paragraphs | 44 |
| Recitals | 7 |
Parties to SCT 059/2020
As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.
| Party | Role |
|---|---|
| Luciane | Claimant |
| The Luterluter Fitness Club Ltd | Defendant |
Sums named in the judgment
These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.
- AED 611.68
- AED 367.50
- AED 12,126
- AED 5,000
- AED 1,000
Authorities cited in SCT 059/2020
The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.
Legislation and practice directions
- DIFC Law No. 5 of 2005 DIFC law
- Employment Law DIFC law
Other decisions citing the same authority
Records of other DIFC Courts decisions that cite at least one of the same instruments. Shared authority is not shared reasoning — each decision turns on its own facts.
- SCT 368/2018 — Jingal v Jane Fz - LLC [2018] DIFC SCT 368 also cites DIFC Law No. 5 of 2005
- SCT 062/2018 — Izaac v Irmina [2018] DIFC SCT 062 also cites DIFC Law No. 5 of 2005
- SCT 334/2017 — Indira LLC v Ingram LLC [2017] SCT 334 also cites DIFC Law No. 5 of 2005
- SCT 120/2017 — Haneul v Hege LLP [2017] DIFC SCT 120 also cites DIFC Law No. 5 of 2005
- 150/2016 — Haya Spa LLC v Harper Real Estate / Hasan Real Estate [2016] DIFC SC also cites DIFC Law No. 5 of 2005
- SCT 004/2017 — Hamza v Heidi Law Firm [2017] DIFC SCT 004 also cites DIFC Law No. 5 of 2005
Primary source
Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.
Acting on a small claims tribunal matter
This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question SCT 059/2020 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.