Directions · Court of Appeal
CA 009/2020 Mr. Salem Dwela v Damac Park Towers Company Limited
A reference record of CA 009/2020, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.
Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation
At a glance
| Claim number | CA 009/2020 |
| Court | DIFC Courts — Court of Appeal |
| Decision | Directions |
| Before | The Court Of Appeal |
| Date | 30 November 2020 |
| Date of issue | 30 November 2020 |
| Operative orders | 3 |
| Numbered paragraphs | 0 |
| Recitals | 3 |
Parties to CA 009/2020
As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.
| Party | Role |
|---|---|
| Mr. Salem Dwela | Appellant |
| Damac Park Towers Company Limited | Respondent |
| Hearing The | Claimant |
| ’S Representative And The | Defendant |
Authorities cited in CA 009/2020
The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.
Legislation and practice directions
- DIFC Law No. 5 of 2005 DIFC law
Other decisions citing the same authority
Records of other DIFC Courts decisions that cite at least one of the same instruments. Shared authority is not shared reasoning — each decision turns on its own facts.
- CFI 054/2020 — CFI 054/2020 (1) Emirates Reit (Ceic) Plc (2) Equitativa (Dubai) Lim also cites DIFC Law No. 5 of 2005
- CFI 037/2019 — Global Advocacy And Legal Counsel v The Industrial Group [2019] DIFC also cites DIFC Law No. 5 of 2005
- SCT 059/2020 — Luciane v The Luterluter Fitness Club Ltd [2020] DIFC SCT 059 also cites DIFC Law No. 5 of 2005
- SCT 368/2018 — Jingal v Jane Fz - LLC [2018] DIFC SCT 368 also cites DIFC Law No. 5 of 2005
- SCT 062/2018 — Izaac v Irmina [2018] DIFC SCT 062 also cites DIFC Law No. 5 of 2005
- SCT 334/2017 — Indira LLC v Ingram LLC [2017] SCT 334 also cites DIFC Law No. 5 of 2005
Primary source
Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.
Acting on a court of appeal matter
This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question CA 009/2020 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.