Order With Reasons · Court of First Instance
CFI 001/2024 Nashir v (1) Nasib (2) Nasr
A reference record of CFI 001/2024, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.
Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation
At a glance
| Claim number | CFI 001/2024 |
| Court | DIFC Courts — Court of First Instance |
| Decision | Order With Reasons |
| Before | Justice Michael Black |
| Date | 9 October 2024 |
| Date of issue | 9 October 2024 |
| Operative orders | 3 |
| Numbered paragraphs | 7 |
| Recitals | 2 |
Parties to CFI 001/2024
As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.
| Party | Role |
|---|---|
| Nashir | Claimant |
| (1) Nasib (2) Nasr | Defendants |
Sums named in the order with reasons
These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.
- USD 150,000
Authorities cited in CFI 001/2024
The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.
Legislation and practice directions
- Practice Direction No. 5 of 2014 Practice Direction
- Practice Direction No. 4 of 2017 Practice Direction
Other decisions citing the same authority
Records of other DIFC Courts decisions that cite at least one of the same instruments. Shared authority is not shared reasoning — each decision turns on its own facts.
- CFI 085/2023 — CFI 085/2023 (1)daikan DMCC (2)salih Elmascan v (1) Poke And Co Rest also cites Practice Direction No. 5 of 2014
- CFI 028/2023 — CFI 028/2023 Globe Investment Holdings Limited v (1) Commercial Bank also cites Practice Direction No. 5 of 2014
- CA 002/2023 — CA 002/2023 (1) Gate Mena Dmcc (Formerly Huobi OTC DMCC) (2) Huobi M also cites Practice Direction No. 5 of 2014
- CA 013/2021 — CA 013/2021 CA 015/2021 IGPL General Trading LLC v (1) Hortin Holdin also cites Practice Direction No. 5 of 2014
- CFI 026/2022 — Marwan Mahmoud Khadour v (1) Yousef Salah Hawash (2) Alphaseed Techn also cites Practice Direction No. 5 of 2014
- CA 002/2021 — (1) Ashok Kumar Goel (2) Sudhir Goyel (3) Manan Goel (4) Prerit Goel also cites Practice Direction No. 5 of 2014
Primary source
Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.
Acting on a court of first instance matter
This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question CFI 001/2024 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.