Order · Court of Appeal
CA 002/2023 (1) Gate Mena Dmcc (Formerly Huobi OTC DMCC) (2) Huobi Mena FZE v (1) Tabarak Investment Capital Limited (2) Christian Thurner
A reference record of CA 002/2023, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.
Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation
At a glance
| Claim number | CA 002/2023 |
| Court | DIFC Courts — Court of Appeal |
| Decision | Order |
| Date | 22 August 2024 |
| Date of issue | 22 August 2024 |
| Operative orders | 10 |
| Numbered paragraphs | 96 |
| Recitals | 6 |
Parties to CA 002/2023
As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.
| Party | Role |
|---|---|
| (2) Huobi Mena Fze | Claimants/Appellants |
| (2) Christian Thurner | Defendants/Respondents |
Decisions in CA 002/2023
The DIFC Courts have published 3 decisions under this claim number. The dates and types below are the court's own record of the sequence.
| Date | Type |
|---|---|
| 13 June 2024 | Judgment |
| 25 July 2024 | Order |
| 22 August 2024 | Order |
Sums named in the order
These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.
- AED 750,000
- AED 961,995.95
- AED 919,900.50
- AED 582,205
- AED 550,000
- AED 1,150,000
Authorities cited in CA 002/2023
The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.
Legislation and practice directions
- Practice Direction No. 5 of 2014 Practice Direction
Rules of the DIFC Courts applied
RDC 4.2, RDC 38.6, RDC 38.7, RDC 38.8, RDC 38.10, RDC 38.34, RDC 44.108 — see the RDC.
Other decisions citing the same authority
Records of other DIFC Courts decisions that cite at least one of the same instruments. Shared authority is not shared reasoning — each decision turns on its own facts.
- CA 013/2021 — CA 013/2021 CA 015/2021 IGPL General Trading LLC v (1) Hortin Holdin also cites Practice Direction No. 5 of 2014
- CFI 026/2022 — Marwan Mahmoud Khadour v (1) Yousef Salah Hawash (2) Alphaseed Techn also cites Practice Direction No. 5 of 2014
- CA 002/2021 — (1) Ashok Kumar Goel (2) Sudhir Goyel (3) Manan Goel (4) Prerit Goel also cites Practice Direction No. 5 of 2014
- CA 010/2020 — (1) Melody (2) Molly v Melance [2020] DIFC CA 010 also cites Practice Direction No. 5 of 2014
- CFI 066/2020 — CFI 066/2020 Credit Suisse (Switzerland) Limited V (1) Ashok Kumar G also cites Practice Direction No. 5 of 2014
- ARB 008/2020 — Limsa (Pty) Ltd v (1) Lordon A Trading Platform Of Dubai Multi Commo also cites Practice Direction No. 5 of 2014
Primary source
Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.
Acting on a court of appeal matter
This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question CA 002/2023 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.