Judgment · Court of First Instance
Marwan Mahmoud Khadour v (1) Yousef Salah Hawash (2) Alphaseed Technology Limited (3) DIFC Registrar Of Companies [2022] DIFC CFI 026
A reference record of CFI 026/2022, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.
Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation
At a glance
| Claim number | CFI 026/2022 |
| Court | DIFC Courts — Court of First Instance |
| Decision | Judgment |
| Date | 20 June 2023 |
| Date of issue | 14 June 2023 |
| Operative orders | 0 |
| Numbered paragraphs | 49 |
| Recitals | 3 |
Parties to CFI 026/2022
As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.
| Party | Role |
|---|---|
| Marwan Mahmoud Khadour | Claimant |
| (3) Difc Registrar Of Companies | Defendants |
Decisions in CFI 026/2022
The DIFC Courts have published 3 decisions under this claim number. The dates and types below are the court's own record of the sequence.
| Date | Type |
|---|---|
| 1 June 2022 | Order |
| 4 October 2022 | Order |
| 20 June 2023 | Judgment |
Sums named in the judgment
These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.
- USD 42,517.79
- USD 85,035.57
Authorities cited in CFI 026/2022
The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.
Legislation and practice directions
- Practice Direction No. 5 of 2014 Practice Direction
Rules of the DIFC Courts applied
RDC 38.30 — see the RDC.
Other decisions citing the same authority
Records of other DIFC Courts decisions that cite at least one of the same instruments. Shared authority is not shared reasoning — each decision turns on its own facts.
- CA 002/2021 — (1) Ashok Kumar Goel (2) Sudhir Goyel (3) Manan Goel (4) Prerit Goel also cites Practice Direction No. 5 of 2014
- CA 010/2020 — (1) Melody (2) Molly v Melance [2020] DIFC CA 010 also cites Practice Direction No. 5 of 2014
- CFI 066/2020 — CFI 066/2020 Credit Suisse (Switzerland) Limited V (1) Ashok Kumar G also cites Practice Direction No. 5 of 2014
- ARB 008/2020 — Limsa (Pty) Ltd v (1) Lordon A Trading Platform Of Dubai Multi Commo also cites Practice Direction No. 5 of 2014
- CA-002-2019 — Mashreq Al Islami Finance Company Pjsc v Mr Babar Rehman [2019] DIFC also cites Practice Direction No. 5 of 2014
- CFI 015/2014 — CFI 015/2014 Asif Hakim Adil v Frontline Development Partners Limite also cites Practice Direction No. 5 of 2014
Primary source
Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.
Acting on a court of first instance matter
This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question CFI 026/2022 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.