Judgment · Court of Appeal

Mashreq Al Islami Finance Company Pjsc v Mr Babar Rehman [2019] DIFC CA 002

A reference record of CA-002-2019, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.

Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation

At a glance

Claim numberCA-002-2019
CourtDIFC Courts — Court of Appeal
DecisionJudgment
Date2 October 2019
Date of issue2 October 2019
Operative orders0
Numbered paragraphs28
Recitals4

Parties to CA-002-2019

As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.

PartyRole
Respondent (Claimant
Appellant (Defendant

Sums named in the judgment

These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.

  • AED 884,635.92
  • AED 575,311.92
  • AED 321,427.12
  • AED 495,485.80
  • AED 80,424
  • AED 495,485

Authorities cited in CA-002-2019

The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.

Legislation and practice directions

  • Practice Direction No. 5 of 2014 Practice Direction

Rules of the DIFC Courts applied

RDC 38.6, RDC 38.17, RDC 38.20, RDC 38.21 — see the RDC.

Records of other DIFC Courts decisions that cite at least one of the same instruments. Shared authority is not shared reasoning — each decision turns on its own facts.

  • CFI 015/2014 — CFI 015/2014 Asif Hakim Adil v Frontline Development Partners Limite also cites Practice Direction No. 5 of 2014
  • ARB 015/2026 — ARB 015/2026 ARB 027/2026 Princeton v Persephone also cites Practice Direction No. 5 of 2014
  • CFI 079/2023 — CFI 079/2023 (1) Thamer Abdulaziz Albulaihid (2) Moustafa El Sayed A also cites Practice Direction No. 5 of 2014
  • CFI 060/2023 — CFI 060/2023 (1) AES Middle East Insurance Broker LLC (2) AES Financ also cites Practice Direction No. 5 of 2014
  • CFI 001/2024 — CFI 001/2024 Nashir v (1) Nasib (2) Nasr also cites Practice Direction No. 5 of 2014
  • CFI 085/2023 — CFI 085/2023 (1)daikan DMCC (2)salih Elmascan v (1) Poke And Co Rest also cites Practice Direction No. 5 of 2014

Primary source

Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.

  • Mashreq Al Islami Finance Company Pjsc v Mr Babar Rehman [2019] DIFC CA 002 — the decision as published DIFC Courts
  • DIFC Courts judgments & orders — the register this decision is listed in DIFC Courts

Acting on a court of appeal matter

This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question CA-002-2019 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.

Speak to us