Order With Reasons · Court of First Instance
CFI 028/2023 Globe Investment Holdings Limited v (1) Commercial Bank Of Dubai (2) Hortin Holding Limited (3) Lodge Hill Limited (4) Westdene Investment Limited (5) 1897 (Cayman) Limited
A reference record of CFI 028/2023, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.
Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation
At a glance
| Claim number | CFI 028/2023 |
| Court | DIFC Courts — Court of First Instance |
| Decision | Order With Reasons |
| Before | Justice Michael Black Kc |
| Date | 25 September 2024 |
| Date of issue | 25 September 2024 |
| Operative orders | 3 |
| Numbered paragraphs | 38 |
| Recitals | 15 |
Parties to CFI 028/2023
As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.
| Party | Role |
|---|---|
| Globe Investment Holdings Limited | Claimant |
| (5) 1897 (Cayman) Limited | Defendants |
Decisions in CFI 028/2023
The DIFC Courts have published 10 decisions under this claim number. The dates and types below are the court's own record of the sequence.
| Date | Type |
|---|---|
| 3 May 2023 | Order |
| 19 May 2023 | Order |
| 19 June 2023 | Order |
| 4 July 2023 | Order |
| 18 September 2023 | Order |
| 30 April 2024 | Order |
| 9 May 2024 | Order |
| 15 May 2024 | Order |
| 12 July 2024 | Order |
| 25 September 2024 | Order |
Sums named in the order with reasons
These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.
- USD 250,000
- USD 63,250.00
- USD 55,000.00
- GBP 235,831.25
- USD 297,942.00
- GBP 71,793.12
Authorities cited in CFI 028/2023
The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.
Legislation and practice directions
- Practice Direction No. 5 of 2014 Practice Direction
Rules of the DIFC Courts applied
RDC 28.67, RDC 38.13 — see the RDC.
Other decisions citing the same authority
Records of other DIFC Courts decisions that cite at least one of the same instruments. Shared authority is not shared reasoning — each decision turns on its own facts.
- CA 002/2023 — CA 002/2023 (1) Gate Mena Dmcc (Formerly Huobi OTC DMCC) (2) Huobi M also cites Practice Direction No. 5 of 2014
- CA 013/2021 — CA 013/2021 CA 015/2021 IGPL General Trading LLC v (1) Hortin Holdin also cites Practice Direction No. 5 of 2014
- CFI 026/2022 — Marwan Mahmoud Khadour v (1) Yousef Salah Hawash (2) Alphaseed Techn also cites Practice Direction No. 5 of 2014
- CA 002/2021 — (1) Ashok Kumar Goel (2) Sudhir Goyel (3) Manan Goel (4) Prerit Goel also cites Practice Direction No. 5 of 2014
- CA 010/2020 — (1) Melody (2) Molly v Melance [2020] DIFC CA 010 also cites Practice Direction No. 5 of 2014
- CFI 066/2020 — CFI 066/2020 Credit Suisse (Switzerland) Limited V (1) Ashok Kumar G also cites Practice Direction No. 5 of 2014
Primary source
Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.
Acting on a court of first instance matter
This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question CFI 028/2023 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.