Order With Reasons · Arbitration Division

ARB 009/2024 Narciso v Nash

A reference record of ARB 009/2024, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.

Where cases like this arise in our work: Arbitration

At a glance

Claim numberARB 009/2024
CourtDIFC Courts — Arbitration Division
DecisionOrder With Reasons
BeforeJustice Michael Black Kc
Date20 June 2024
Date of issue20 June 2024
Operative orders5
Numbered paragraphs89
Recitals9

Parties to ARB 009/2024

As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.

PartyRole
NarcisoClaimant/Applicant
NashDefendant/Respondent

Sums named in the order with reasons

These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.

  • AED 17,816,932.25

Authorities cited in ARB 009/2024

The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.

Legislation and practice directions

Rules of the DIFC Courts applied

RDC 8.20 — see the RDC.

Records of other DIFC Courts decisions that cite at least one of the same instruments. Shared authority is not shared reasoning — each decision turns on its own facts.

  • CFI 048/2023 — CFI 048/2023 Gulf Petrochem FZC LLC v (1) Petrochina International ( also cites Arbitration Law
  • ARB 018/2022 — ARB 018/2022 Lathor v Liufan also cites Arbitration Law
  • CA 013/2022 — Ledger v Leeor [2022] DIFC CA 013 also cites Arbitration Law
  • ARB 028/2020 — ARB 028/2020 Likitif v Luvaun also cites Arbitration Law
  • ARB 016/2022 — ARB 016/2022 Ledger v Leeor also cites Arbitration Law
  • ARB 017-2020 — ARB 017-2020 ARB 021-2021 (1) Cesfin Ventures LLC (2) Cessna also cites Arbitration Law

Primary source

Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.

  • ARB 009/2024 Narciso v Nash — the decision as published DIFC Courts
  • DIFC Courts judgments & orders — the register this decision is listed in DIFC Courts

Acting on a arbitration division matter

This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question ARB 009/2024 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.

Speak to us