Order · Arbitration Division

ARB 018/2022 Lathor v Liufan

A reference record of ARB 018/2022, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.

Where cases like this arise in our work: Arbitration

At a glance

Claim numberARB 018/2022
CourtDIFC Courts — Arbitration Division
DecisionOrder
BeforeH.E Justice Shamlan Al Sawalehi
Date14 November 2022
Date of issue14 November 2022
Operative orders5
Numbered paragraphs0
Recitals2

Parties to ARB 018/2022

As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.

PartyRole
LathorClaimant
LiufanDefendant

Sums named in the order

These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.

  • AED 15,500
  • AED 2,346.75
  • AED 1,900
  • AED 31,000
  • AED 25,000
  • AED 111

Authorities cited in ARB 018/2022

The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.

Legislation and practice directions

Records of other DIFC Courts decisions that cite at least one of the same instruments. Shared authority is not shared reasoning — each decision turns on its own facts.

  • ARB 028/2020 — ARB 028/2020 Likitif v Luvaun also cites DIFC Law No. 1 of 2008
  • CA 005/2021 — Lachesis v Lacrosse [2021] DIFC CA 005 also cites DIFC Law No. 1 of 2008
  • ARB 030/2020 — ARB 030/2020 (1) Liman (2) Ludi v (1) Layli (2) Luni also cites DIFC Law No. 1 of 2008
  • CFI 042/2021 — Lutyans v Litha [2021] DIFC CFI 042 also cites DIFC Law No. 1 of 2008
  • CA 007/2020 — Lahela v Lameez [2020] DIFC CA 007 also cites DIFC Law No. 1 of 2008
  • ARB 008/2020 — Limsa (Pty) Ltd v (1) Lordon A Trading Platform Of Dubai Multi Commo also cites DIFC Law No. 1 of 2008

Primary source

Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.

  • ARB 018/2022 Lathor v Liufan — the decision as published DIFC Courts
  • DIFC Courts judgments & orders — the register this decision is listed in DIFC Courts

Acting on a arbitration division matter

This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question ARB 018/2022 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.

Speak to us