Order · Court of First Instance
CFI 048/2023 Gulf Petrochem FZC LLC v (1) Petrochina International (Middle East) Company Limited (2) Petrochina International (Singapore) PTE Ltd (3) Intertek Fujairah FZC LLC (Branch Office) (4) Intertek Sharjah FZ LLC
A reference record of CFI 048/2023, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.
Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation
At a glance
| Claim number | CFI 048/2023 |
| Court | DIFC Courts — Court of First Instance |
| Decision | Order |
| Date | 23 November 2023 |
| Date of issue | 20 November 2023 |
| Operative orders | 0 |
| Numbered paragraphs | 170 |
| Recitals | 6 |
Parties to CFI 048/2023
As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.
| Party | Role |
|---|---|
| Gulf Petrochem Fzc Llc | Claimant |
| (4) Intertek Sharjah Fz Llc | Defendants |
Decisions in CFI 048/2023
The DIFC Courts have published 4 decisions under this claim number. The dates and types below are the court's own record of the sequence.
| Date | Type |
|---|---|
| 9 August 2023 | Order |
| 19 September 2023 | Order |
| 19 October 2023 | Order |
| 23 November 2023 | Order |
Sums named in the order
These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.
- AED 251,852.86
- AED 346,243.80
Authorities cited in CFI 048/2023
The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.
Legislation and practice directions
- DIFC Law No. 1 of 2008 DIFC law
- Arbitration Law DIFC law
Rules of the DIFC Courts applied
RDC 9.2, RDC 9.8, RDC 9.15, RDC 9.19, RDC 13.22 — see the RDC.
Other decisions citing the same authority
Records of other DIFC Courts decisions that cite at least one of the same instruments. Shared authority is not shared reasoning — each decision turns on its own facts.
- ARB 018/2022 — ARB 018/2022 Lathor v Liufan also cites DIFC Law No. 1 of 2008
- ARB 028/2020 — ARB 028/2020 Likitif v Luvaun also cites DIFC Law No. 1 of 2008
- CA 005/2021 — Lachesis v Lacrosse [2021] DIFC CA 005 also cites DIFC Law No. 1 of 2008
- ARB 030/2020 — ARB 030/2020 (1) Liman (2) Ludi v (1) Layli (2) Luni also cites DIFC Law No. 1 of 2008
- CFI 042/2021 — Lutyans v Litha [2021] DIFC CFI 042 also cites DIFC Law No. 1 of 2008
- CA 007/2020 — Lahela v Lameez [2020] DIFC CA 007 also cites DIFC Law No. 1 of 2008
Primary source
Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.
Acting on a court of first instance matter
This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question CFI 048/2023 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.