Order With Reasons · Arbitration Division
ARB 016/2022 Ledger v Leeor
A reference record of ARB 016/2022, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.
Where cases like this arise in our work: Arbitration
At a glance
| Claim number | ARB 016/2022 |
| Court | DIFC Courts — Arbitration Division |
| Decision | Order With Reasons |
| Before | Justice Michael Black |
| Date | 7 October 2022 |
| Date of issue | 7 October 2022 |
| Operative orders | 3 |
| Numbered paragraphs | 52 |
| Recitals | 3 |
Parties to ARB 016/2022
As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.
| Party | Role |
|---|---|
| Ledger | Applicant/Claimant |
| Leeor | Respondent/Defendant |
Sums named in the order with reasons
These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.
- AED 348,000,000
- AED 84,080,856.83
- AED 34,800,000
Authorities cited in ARB 016/2022
The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.
Legislation and practice directions
- Arbitration Law DIFC law
Other decisions citing the same authority
Records of other DIFC Courts decisions that cite at least one of the same instruments. Shared authority is not shared reasoning — each decision turns on its own facts.
- ARB 017-2020 — ARB 017-2020 ARB 021-2021 (1) Cesfin Ventures LLC (2) Cessna also cites Arbitration Law
- CA 005/2021 — Lachesis v Lacrosse [2021] DIFC CA 005 also cites Arbitration Law
- ARB 030/2020 — ARB 030/2020 (1) Liman (2) Ludi v (1) Layli (2) Luni also cites Arbitration Law
- CFI 042/2021 — Lutyans v Litha [2021] DIFC CFI 042 also cites Arbitration Law
- CA 007/2020 — Lahela v Lameez [2020] DIFC CA 007 also cites Arbitration Law
- ARB 006/2021 — (1) Medimpact International LLC (2) Medimpact International Hk Limit also cites Arbitration Law
Primary source
Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.
Acting on a arbitration division matter
This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question ARB 016/2022 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.