Judgment · Court of First Instance
Vision Construction L.L.C. v Banque Misr UAE [2022] DIFC CFI 049
A reference record of CFI 049/2022, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.
Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation
At a glance
| Claim number | CFI 049/2022 |
| Court | DIFC Courts — Court of First Instance |
| Decision | Judgment |
| Date | 8 October 2024 |
| Date of issue | 7 October 2024 |
| Operative orders | 3 |
| Numbered paragraphs | 42 |
| Recitals | 6 |
Parties to CFI 049/2022
As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.
| Party | Role |
|---|---|
| Vision Construction L.L.C. | Claimant |
| Banque Misr Uae | Defendant |
Decisions in CFI 049/2022
The DIFC Courts have published 5 decisions under this claim number. The dates and types below are the court's own record of the sequence.
| Date | Type |
|---|---|
| 15 March 2023 | Order |
| 25 October 2023 | Order |
| 5 December 2023 | Judgment |
| 25 June 2024 | Order |
| 8 October 2024 | Judgment |
Sums named in the judgment
These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.
- USD 357,116.66
- USD 999,269.05
- USD 2,371,817.83
- USD 2,014,701.17
Authorities cited in CFI 049/2022
The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.
Legislation and practice directions
- DIFC Law No. 5 of 2005 DIFC law
- Contract Law DIFC law
Other decisions citing the same authority
Records of other DIFC Courts decisions that cite at least one of the same instruments. Shared authority is not shared reasoning — each decision turns on its own facts.
- CA 011/2022 — SBM Bank (Mauritius) Ltd v (1) Renish Petrochem FZE (2) Mr Hiteshkum also cites DIFC Law No. 5 of 2005
- SCT 198/2023 — Mishtun v Mawul [2023] DIFC SCT 198 also cites DIFC Law No. 5 of 2005
- SCT 406/2022 — Liv v Lava Ltd [2022] DIFC SCT 406 also cites DIFC Law No. 5 of 2005
- SCT 384/2022 — Lihart v Lufant [2022] DIFC SCT 384 also cites DIFC Law No. 5 of 2005
- CA 002/2022 — Expresso Telecom Group Ltd v Tarig H.A.G Rahamtalla [2022] DIFC CA 0 also cites DIFC Law No. 5 of 2005
- CA 009/2020 — CA 009/2020 Mr. Salem Dwela v Damac Park Towers Company Limited also cites DIFC Law No. 5 of 2005
Primary source
Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.
Acting on a court of first instance matter
This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question CFI 049/2022 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.