Order With Reasons · Small Claims Tribunal
Pembroke v Paloma [2025] SCT 946
A reference record of SCT 946/2025, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.
Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation
At a glance
| Claim number | SCT 946/2025 |
| Court | DIFC Courts — Small Claims Tribunal |
| Decision | Order With Reasons |
| Before | H.E. Justice Rene Le Miere |
| Date | 19 August 2026 |
| Date of issue | 19 August 2026 |
| Operative orders | 2 |
| Numbered paragraphs | 93 |
| Recitals | 5 |
Parties to SCT 946/2025
As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.
| Party | Role |
|---|---|
| Pembroke | Claimant/Respondent |
| Paloma | Defendant/Appellant |
Sums named in the order with reasons
These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.
- AED 35,224
- GBP 1,500
- AED 2,133.50
Authorities cited in SCT 946/2025
The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.
Rules of the DIFC Courts applied
RDC 53.76, RDC 53.87, RDC 53.91 — see the RDC.
Other decisions of the same division
Records of DIFC Courts decisions heard in the same division around the same time. This decision cites no instrument we hold a record of, so these are listed by division and date rather than by shared authority.
- SCT 383/2022 — Luftin v Lahire [2022] SCT 383
- SCT 135/2022 — Luhart v Lifan [2022] DIFC SCT 135
- SCT 384/2022 — Lihart v Lufant [2022] DIFC SCT 384
- SCT 362/2022 — Luyam v (1) Lehat (2) Larst [2022] DIFC SCT 362
- SCT 371/2022 — Lumrit v Litif [2022] DIFC SCT 371
- SCT 373/2022 — Lacwit v Lifurt [2022] DIFC SCT 373
Primary source
Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.
Acting on a small claims tribunal matter
This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question SCT 946/2025 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.