Judgment · Small Claims Tribunal
Luftin v Lahire [2022] SCT 383
A reference record of SCT 383/2022, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.
Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation
At a glance
| Claim number | SCT 383/2022 |
| Court | DIFC Courts — Small Claims Tribunal |
| Decision | Judgment |
| Before | H.E. Justice Maha Al Mheiri |
| Date | 20 December 2022 |
| Date of issue | 20 December 2022 |
| Operative orders | 3 |
| Numbered paragraphs | 38 |
| Recitals | 3 |
Parties to SCT 383/2022
As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.
| Party | Role |
|---|---|
| Luftin | Claimant |
| Lahire | Defendant |
Sums named in the judgment
These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.
- AED 3,082.12
- AED 367.50
- AED 3,000
- AED 1,500
- AED 5,000
- AED 2,477.75
Authorities cited in SCT 383/2022
The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.
Legislation and practice directions
- DIFC Law No. 2 of 2019 DIFC law
- DIFC Law No. 4 of 2021 DIFC law
- Employment Law DIFC law
Other decisions citing the same authority
Records of other DIFC Courts decisions that cite at least one of the same instruments. Shared authority is not shared reasoning — each decision turns on its own facts.
- SCT 379/2022 — Lehani v Lufit [2022] DIFC SCT 379 also cites DIFC Law No. 2 of 2019
- SCT 337/2022 — Lufath v Lict [2022] DIFC SCT 337 also cites DIFC Law No. 2 of 2019
- CA 002/2022 — Expresso Telecom Group Ltd v Tarig H.A.G Rahamtalla [2022] DIFC CA 0 also cites DIFC Law No. 2 of 2019
- SCT 255/2022 — Mivte v Madie [2022] DIFC SCT 255 also cites DIFC Law No. 2 of 2019
- SCT 107/2022 — Madesh v Muhura [2022] DIFC SCT 107 also cites DIFC Law No. 2 of 2019
- SCT 136/2022 — Lorenzo v Lilith Restaurant and Lounge [2022] DIFC SCT 136 also cites DIFC Law No. 2 of 2019
Primary source
Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.
Acting on a small claims tribunal matter
This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question SCT 383/2022 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.