Judgment · Small Claims Tribunal
Naveen v Ned [2024] DIFC SCT 068
A reference record of SCT 068/2024, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.
Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation
At a glance
| Claim number | SCT 068/2024 |
| Court | DIFC Courts — Small Claims Tribunal |
| Decision | Judgment |
| Before | H.E. Justice Maha Al Mheiri |
| Date | 11 July 2024 |
| Date of issue | 11 July 2024 |
| Operative orders | 3 |
| Numbered paragraphs | 43 |
| Recitals | 3 |
Parties to SCT 068/2024
As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.
| Party | Role |
|---|---|
| Naveen | Claimant |
| Ned | Defendant |
Decisions in SCT 068/2024
The DIFC Courts have published 3 decisions under this claim number. The dates and types below are the court's own record of the sequence.
| Date | Type |
|---|---|
| 20 March 2024 | Judgment or Order |
| 17 April 2024 | Judgment or Order |
| 11 July 2024 | Judgment or Order |
Sums named in the judgment
These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.
- AED 92,815.73
- AED 1,856.31
- AED 93,156.55
- AED 45,000
- AED 4,023
- AED 33,342.36
Authorities cited in SCT 068/2024
The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.
Legislation and practice directions
- DIFC Law No. 2 of 2019 DIFC law
- Employment Law DIFC law
- Practice Direction No. 4 of 2017 Practice Direction
Rules of the DIFC Courts applied
RDC 53.61 — see the RDC.
Other decisions citing the same authority
Records of other DIFC Courts decisions that cite at least one of the same instruments. Shared authority is not shared reasoning — each decision turns on its own facts.
- SCT 160/2024 — Nathaniel v Nico [2024] DIFC SCT 160 also cites DIFC Law No. 2 of 2019
- SCT 089/2023 — Murkan v Mishti [2023] DIFC SCT 089 also cites DIFC Law No. 2 of 2019
- SCT 029/2023 — Mintil v Mester [2023] DIFC SCT 029 also cites DIFC Law No. 2 of 2019
- SCT 439/2022 — Mirti v Molip [2022] DIFC SCT 439 also cites DIFC Law No. 2 of 2019
- SCT 406/2022 — Liv v Lava Ltd [2022] DIFC SCT 406 also cites DIFC Law No. 2 of 2019
- SCT 383/2022 — Luftin v Lahire [2022] SCT 383 also cites DIFC Law No. 2 of 2019
Primary source
Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.
Acting on a small claims tribunal matter
This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question SCT 068/2024 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.