Judgment · Small Claims Tribunal

Mirti v Molip [2022] DIFC SCT 439

A reference record of SCT 439/2022, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.

Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation

At a glance

Claim numberSCT 439/2022
CourtDIFC Courts — Small Claims Tribunal
DecisionJudgment
BeforeSct Judge Maitha Alshehhi
Date9 February 2023
Date of issue9 February 2023
Operative orders3
Numbered paragraphs44
Recitals5

Parties to SCT 439/2022

As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.

PartyRole
MirtiClaimant
MolipDefendant

Sums named in the judgment

These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.

  • AED 12,215.40
  • AED 379.99
  • AED 10,000
  • AED 12,000
  • AED 19,000
  • AED 7,000

Authorities cited in SCT 439/2022

The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.

Legislation and practice directions

  • DIFC Law No. 2 of 2019 DIFC law
  • DIFC Law No. 4 of 2020 DIFC law
  • Employment Law DIFC law

Rules of the DIFC Courts applied

RDC 53.30, RDC 53.61 — see the RDC.

Records of other DIFC Courts decisions that cite at least one of the same instruments. Shared authority is not shared reasoning — each decision turns on its own facts.

  • SCT 406/2022 — Liv v Lava Ltd [2022] DIFC SCT 406 also cites DIFC Law No. 2 of 2019
  • SCT 383/2022 — Luftin v Lahire [2022] SCT 383 also cites DIFC Law No. 2 of 2019
  • SCT 379/2022 — Lehani v Lufit [2022] DIFC SCT 379 also cites DIFC Law No. 2 of 2019
  • SCT 337/2022 — Lufath v Lict [2022] DIFC SCT 337 also cites DIFC Law No. 2 of 2019
  • CA 002/2022 — Expresso Telecom Group Ltd v Tarig H.A.G Rahamtalla [2022] DIFC CA 0 also cites DIFC Law No. 2 of 2019
  • SCT 255/2022 — Mivte v Madie [2022] DIFC SCT 255 also cites DIFC Law No. 2 of 2019

Primary source

Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.

  • Mirti v Molip [2022] DIFC SCT 439 — the decision as published DIFC Courts
  • DIFC Courts judgments & orders — the register this decision is listed in DIFC Courts

Acting on a small claims tribunal matter

This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question SCT 439/2022 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.

Speak to us