Judgment · Small Claims Tribunal

Irelyn v (1) Iakopa (2) Ituha LLP (In Liquidation) [2018] DIFC SCT 221

A reference record of SCT 221/2018, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.

Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation

At a glance

Claim numberSCT 221/2018
CourtDIFC Courts — Small Claims Tribunal
DecisionJudgment
BeforeSct Judge Nassir Al Nasser
Date9 August 2018
Date of issue9 August 2018
Operative orders3
Numbered paragraphs78
Recitals4

Parties to SCT 221/2018

As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.

PartyRole
Irelyn Fz LlcClaimant
FirstDefendant

Sums named in the judgment

These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.

  • USD 76,478.98
  • USD 3,823.94
  • USD 253,390.96
  • USD 249,618.48
  • USD 15,000
  • USD 23,000

Authorities cited in SCT 221/2018

The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.

Legislation and practice directions

  • DIFC Law No. 10 of 2004 DIFC law
  • Practice Direction No. 4 of 2017 Practice Direction

Records of other DIFC Courts decisions that cite at least one of the same instruments. Shared authority is not shared reasoning — each decision turns on its own facts.

  • SCT 049/2017 — Haloke v Halil Pjsc [2017] DIFC SCT 049 also cites DIFC Law No. 10 of 2004
  • SCT XXXX — Hades Property & Infrastructure Consultants LLC v Hadassah Real Esta also cites DIFC Law No. 10 of 2004
  • CA 002/2015 — Fidel v (1) Felecia (2) Faraz [2015] DIFC CA 002 also cites DIFC Law No. 10 of 2004
  • CA-004-2015 — Investment Group Private Limited v Standard Chartered Bank [2015] DI also cites DIFC Law No. 10 of 2004
  • CFI 082/2025 — CFI 082/2025 Tysers Insurance Brokers Limited v (1) Ardonagh Special also cites DIFC Law No. 10 of 2004
  • CA 001/2025 — (1) Trafigura PTE LTD (2) Trafigura India PTV LTD v (1) Mr Prateek G also cites DIFC Law No. 10 of 2004

Primary source

Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.

  • Irelyn v (1) Iakopa (2) Ituha LLP (In Liquidation) [2018] DIFC SCT 221 — the decision as published DIFC Courts
  • DIFC Courts judgments & orders — the register this decision is listed in DIFC Courts

Acting on a small claims tribunal matter

This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question SCT 221/2018 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.

Speak to us