Reasons For The Order · Court of First Instance
CFI 082/2025 Tysers Insurance Brokers Limited v (1) Ardonagh Specialty (Mena) Limited T/A Price Forbes DIFC / Price Forbes & Partners (2) Jayees Ibrahim Velikkalagath
A reference record of CFI 082/2025, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.
Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation
At a glance
| Claim number | CFI 082/2025 |
| Court | DIFC Courts — Court of First Instance |
| Decision | Reasons For The Order |
| Before | H.E. Deputy Chief Justice Ali Al Madhani Dated 7 October 2025 |
| Date | 6 November 2025 |
| Date of issue | 6 November 2025 |
| Operative orders | 0 |
| Numbered paragraphs | 83 |
| Recitals | 1 |
Parties to CFI 082/2025
As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.
| Party | Role |
|---|---|
| Tysers Insurance Brokers Limited | Claimant |
| (2) Jayees Ibrahim Velikkalagath | Defendants |
Decisions in CFI 082/2025
The DIFC Courts have published 2 decisions under this claim number. The dates and types below are the court's own record of the sequence.
| Date | Type |
|---|---|
| 7 October 2025 | Order |
| 6 November 2025 | Order |
Sums named in the reasons for the order
These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.
- GBP 632,558.65
Authorities cited in CFI 082/2025
The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.
Legislation and practice directions
- DIFC Law No. 10 of 2004 DIFC law
- DIFC Law No. 2 of 2025 DIFC law
- Contract Law DIFC law
Rules of the DIFC Courts applied
RDC 1.6, RDC 25.1 — see the RDC.
Other decisions citing the same authority
Records of other DIFC Courts decisions that cite at least one of the same instruments. Shared authority is not shared reasoning — each decision turns on its own facts.
- CA 001/2025 — (1) Trafigura PTE LTD (2) Trafigura India PTV LTD v (1) Mr Prateek G also cites DIFC Law No. 10 of 2004
- CFI 087/2024 — CFI 087/2024 Al Ramz Capital LLC v Dubai Financial Services Authorit also cites DIFC Law No. 10 of 2004
- CA 003/2024 — Carmon Reestrutura-engenharia E Serviços Técnios Especiais, (Su) LDA also cites DIFC Law No. 10 of 2004
- ARB 018/2023 — ARB 018/2023 (1) Nuriel (2) Naufil (3) Nishat v (1) Nuzhat (2) Nayaa also cites DIFC Law No. 10 of 2004
- CFI 004/2024 — CFI 004/2024 Skatteforvaltningen (The Danish Customs And Tax Adminis also cites DIFC Law No. 10 of 2004
- CFI 092/2023 — CFI 092/2023 Gibson Consultants Ltd v The Emirates Capital Limited also cites DIFC Law No. 10 of 2004
Primary source
Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.
Acting on a court of first instance matter
This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question CFI 082/2025 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.