Order · Small Claims Tribunal

Haloke v Halil Pjsc [2017] DIFC SCT 049

A reference record of SCT 049/2017, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.

Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation

At a glance

Claim numberSCT 049/2017
CourtDIFC Courts — Small Claims Tribunal
DecisionOrder
BeforeSct Judge Nassir Al Nasser
Date11 April 2017
Date of issue11 April 2017
Operative orders0
Numbered paragraphs33
Recitals2

Parties to SCT 049/2017

As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.

PartyRole
HalokeClaimant
Halil PjscDefendant

Sums named in the order

These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.

  • AED 343,950
  • AED 100,000
  • USD 91,720.00
  • AED 500,000

Authorities cited in SCT 049/2017

The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.

Legislation and practice directions

Rules of the DIFC Courts applied

RDC 53.2, RDC 53.70 — see the RDC.

Records of other DIFC Courts decisions that cite at least one of the same instruments. Shared authority is not shared reasoning — each decision turns on its own facts.

  • SCT XXXX — Hades Property & Infrastructure Consultants LLC v Hadassah Real Esta also cites DIFC Law No. 10 of 2004
  • CA 002/2015 — Fidel v (1) Felecia (2) Faraz [2015] DIFC CA 002 also cites DIFC Law No. 10 of 2004
  • CA-004-2015 — Investment Group Private Limited v Standard Chartered Bank [2015] DI also cites DIFC Law No. 10 of 2004
  • CFI 082/2025 — CFI 082/2025 Tysers Insurance Brokers Limited v (1) Ardonagh Special also cites DIFC Law No. 10 of 2004
  • CA 001/2025 — (1) Trafigura PTE LTD (2) Trafigura India PTV LTD v (1) Mr Prateek G also cites DIFC Law No. 10 of 2004
  • CFI 087/2024 — CFI 087/2024 Al Ramz Capital LLC v Dubai Financial Services Authorit also cites DIFC Law No. 10 of 2004

Primary source

Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.

  • Haloke v Halil Pjsc [2017] DIFC SCT 049 — the decision as published DIFC Courts
  • DIFC Courts judgments & orders — the register this decision is listed in DIFC Courts

Acting on a small claims tribunal matter

This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question SCT 049/2017 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.

Speak to us