Judgment · Court of Appeal
Gulf Wings FZE v A And K Trading Limited and (1) Mr Kamel Abou Aly (2) Mr Ahmed Abouhashima [2022] DIFC CA 014
A reference record of CA 014/2022, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.
Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation
At a glance
| Claim number | CA 014/2022 |
| Court | DIFC Courts — Court of Appeal |
| Decision | Judgment |
| Before | The Court Of Appeal |
| Date | 12 December 2022 |
| Date of issue | 12 December 2022 |
| Operative orders | 5 |
| Numbered paragraphs | 44 |
| Recitals | 9 |
Parties to CA 014/2022
As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.
| Party | Role |
|---|---|
| Gulf Wings Fze | Appellant/Claimant |
| A And K Trading Limited | Respondent/Defendant |
| (2) Mr Ahmed Abouhashima | Respondents |
Decisions in CA 014/2022
The DIFC Courts have published 2 decisions under this claim number. The dates and types below are the court's own record of the sequence.
| Date | Type |
|---|---|
| 12 December 2022 | Judgment |
| 12 December 2022 | Judgment |
Sums named in the judgment
These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.
- USD 1,272,798.55
- USD 100,000
- USD 288,017.67
- AED 4,674,354.33
- AED 2,674,354.33
- USD 288,000
Authorities cited in CA 014/2022
The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.
Legislation and practice directions
- DIFC Law No. 10 of 2004 DIFC law
Rules of the DIFC Courts applied
RDC 52.37 — see the RDC.
Other decisions citing the same authority
Records of other DIFC Courts decisions that cite at least one of the same instruments. Shared authority is not shared reasoning — each decision turns on its own facts.
- CFI 055/2022 — Lombard North Central PLC v R D K International LLC [2022] DIFC CFI also cites DIFC Law No. 10 of 2004
- CFI 008/2022 — Kpmg Llp V The Dubai Financial Services Authority And Milind Ajit Na also cites DIFC Law No. 10 of 2004
- CFI 047/2019 — CFI 047/2019 Caterpillar Financial Services (Dubai) Limited v (1) Om also cites DIFC Law No. 10 of 2004
- CFI 060/2021 — CFI 060/2021 Lumbini v Lotika also cites DIFC Law No. 10 of 2004
- CFI 032/2020 — CFI 032/2020 Kaamil v (1) Kaawa (2) Kaabii (3) Kadija (4) Kaemon (5) also cites DIFC Law No. 10 of 2004
- CA 011/2021 — Musaab Tag Elsir Abdelsalam v Expresso Telecom Group [2021] DIFC CA also cites DIFC Law No. 10 of 2004
Primary source
Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.
Acting on a court of appeal matter
This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question CA 014/2022 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.