Order With Reasons · Court of First Instance
CFI 060/2021 Lumbini v Lotika
A reference record of CFI 060/2021, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.
Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation
At a glance
| Claim number | CFI 060/2021 |
| Court | DIFC Courts — Court of First Instance |
| Decision | Order With Reasons |
| Before | Justice Sir Jeremy Cooke |
| Date | 5 January 2022 |
| Date of issue | 5 August 2021 |
| Operative orders | 2 |
| Numbered paragraphs | 6 |
| Recitals | 4 |
Parties to CFI 060/2021
As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.
| Party | Role |
|---|---|
| Lumbini | Claimant |
| Lotika | Defendant |
Decisions in CFI 060/2021
The DIFC Courts have published 3 decisions under this claim number. The dates and types below are the court's own record of the sequence.
| Date | Type |
|---|---|
| 16 June 2021 | Order |
| 5 August 2021 | Order |
| 5 January 2022 | Order |
Authorities cited in CFI 060/2021
The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.
Legislation and practice directions
- DIFC Law No. 10 of 2004 DIFC law
Other decisions citing the same authority
Records of other DIFC Courts decisions that cite at least one of the same instruments. Shared authority is not shared reasoning — each decision turns on its own facts.
- CFI 032/2020 — CFI 032/2020 Kaamil v (1) Kaawa (2) Kaabii (3) Kadija (4) Kaemon (5) also cites DIFC Law No. 10 of 2004
- CA 011/2021 — Musaab Tag Elsir Abdelsalam v Expresso Telecom Group [2021] DIFC CA also cites DIFC Law No. 10 of 2004
- CA 007/2020 — Lahela v Lameez [2020] DIFC CA 007 also cites DIFC Law No. 10 of 2004
- CFI 031/2019 — CFI 031/2019 Mr Ebrahim Al-jassim v (1) Socii Synergy Investment LLC also cites DIFC Law No. 10 of 2004
- CFI-060-2018 — CFI 060/2018 Timothy David Monks v (1) William Robert Meadows (2) Ad also cites DIFC Law No. 10 of 2004
- SCT 221/2018 — Irelyn v (1) Iakopa (2) Ituha LLP (In Liquidation) [2018] DIFC SCT 2 also cites DIFC Law No. 10 of 2004
Primary source
Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.
Acting on a court of first instance matter
This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question CFI 060/2021 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.