Order · Court of First Instance
Lombard North Central PLC v R D K International LLC [2022] DIFC CFI 055
A reference record of CFI 055/2022, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.
Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation
At a glance
| Claim number | CFI 055/2022 |
| Court | DIFC Courts — Court of First Instance |
| Decision | Order |
| Date | 11 October 2022 |
| Date of issue | 11 October 2022 |
| Operative orders | 0 |
| Numbered paragraphs | 14 |
| Recitals | 1 |
Parties to CFI 055/2022
As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.
| Party | Role |
|---|---|
| Lombard North Central Plc | Claimant |
| R D K International Llc | Defendant |
Decisions in CFI 055/2022
The DIFC Courts have published 3 decisions under this claim number. The dates and types below are the court's own record of the sequence.
| Date | Type |
|---|---|
| 14 September 2022 | Order |
| 20 September 2022 | Order |
| 11 October 2022 | Order |
Authorities cited in CFI 055/2022
The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.
Legislation and practice directions
- DIFC Law No. 10 of 2004 DIFC law
- Practice Direction No. 4 of 2017 Practice Direction
Rules of the DIFC Courts applied
RDC 4.16, RDC 9.43, RDC 13.3, RDC 13.4, RDC 13.6, RDC 13.7, RDC 13.9, RDC 13.14, RDC 13.22, RDC 13.23, RDC 13.24, RDC 14.2, RDC 15.14 — see the RDC.
Other decisions citing the same authority
Records of other DIFC Courts decisions that cite at least one of the same instruments. Shared authority is not shared reasoning — each decision turns on its own facts.
- CFI 008/2022 — Kpmg Llp V The Dubai Financial Services Authority And Milind Ajit Na also cites DIFC Law No. 10 of 2004
- CFI 047/2019 — CFI 047/2019 Caterpillar Financial Services (Dubai) Limited v (1) Om also cites DIFC Law No. 10 of 2004
- CFI 060/2021 — CFI 060/2021 Lumbini v Lotika also cites DIFC Law No. 10 of 2004
- CFI 032/2020 — CFI 032/2020 Kaamil v (1) Kaawa (2) Kaabii (3) Kadija (4) Kaemon (5) also cites DIFC Law No. 10 of 2004
- CA 011/2021 — Musaab Tag Elsir Abdelsalam v Expresso Telecom Group [2021] DIFC CA also cites DIFC Law No. 10 of 2004
- CA 007/2020 — Lahela v Lameez [2020] DIFC CA 007 also cites DIFC Law No. 10 of 2004
Primary source
Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.
Acting on a court of first instance matter
This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question CFI 055/2022 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.