Order With Reasons · Arbitration Division
ARB 020/2022 Novak v Newland
A reference record of ARB 020/2022, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.
Where cases like this arise in our work: Arbitration
At a glance
| Claim number | ARB 020/2022 |
| Court | DIFC Courts — Arbitration Division |
| Decision | Order With Reasons |
| Before | H. E. Justice Shamlan Al Sawalehi |
| Date | 25 October 2024 |
| Date of issue | 25 October 2024 |
| Operative orders | 4 |
| Numbered paragraphs | 46 |
| Recitals | 7 |
Parties to ARB 020/2022
As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.
| Party | Role |
|---|---|
| Novak | Claimant/Respondent |
| Newland | Defendant/Applicant |
| 34. This Point Was Not Presented As A Ground Of Appeal, However, Was Addressed By The Respondent And | Applicant |
Decisions in ARB 020/2022
The DIFC Courts have published 2 decisions under this claim number. The dates and types below are the court's own record of the sequence.
| Date | Type |
|---|---|
| 1 August 2024 | Order |
| 25 October 2024 | Order |
Sums named in the order with reasons
These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.
- AED 160,722,046
Authorities cited in ARB 020/2022
The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.
Legislation and practice directions
- DIFC Law No. 1 of 2008 DIFC law
- Arbitration Law DIFC law
Rules of the DIFC Courts applied
RDC 43.70, RDC 43.71, RDC 43.75, RDC 44.19, RDC 44.29, RDC 44.30, RDC 44.117, RDC 45.2 — see the RDC.
Other decisions citing the same authority
Records of other DIFC Courts decisions that cite at least one of the same instruments. Shared authority is not shared reasoning — each decision turns on its own facts.
- ARB 018/2024 — ARB 018/2024 Naatiq v Nabeeh also cites DIFC Law No. 1 of 2008
- ARB 011/2024 — ARB 011/2024 Nazeer v Noah also cites DIFC Law No. 1 of 2008
- CFI 048/2023 — CFI 048/2023 Gulf Petrochem FZC LLC v (1) Petrochina International ( also cites DIFC Law No. 1 of 2008
- ARB 018/2022 — ARB 018/2022 Lathor v Liufan also cites DIFC Law No. 1 of 2008
- ARB 028/2020 — ARB 028/2020 Likitif v Luvaun also cites DIFC Law No. 1 of 2008
- CA 005/2021 — Lachesis v Lacrosse [2021] DIFC CA 005 also cites DIFC Law No. 1 of 2008
Primary source
Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.
Acting on a arbitration division matter
This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question ARB 020/2022 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.