Judgment · Small Claims Tribunal
Adolf v Abia [2010] DIFC SCT 006
A reference record of SCT 006/2010, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.
Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation
At a glance
| Claim number | SCT 006/2010 |
| Court | DIFC Courts — Small Claims Tribunal |
| Decision | Judgment |
| Before | Sct |
| Date | 30 December 2010 |
| Date of issue | 30 December 2010 |
| Operative orders | 0 |
| Numbered paragraphs | 13 |
| Recitals | 1 |
Parties to SCT 006/2010
As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.
| Party | Role |
|---|---|
| Adolf | Claimant |
| Abia | Defendant |
Sums named in the judgment
These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.
- AED 52,526.00
- AED 800.00
- AED 80,052.91
- AED 13,000.00
- AED 2,166.00
- AED 1,500.00
Authorities cited in SCT 006/2010
The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.
Legislation and practice directions
- Employment Law DIFC law
Other decisions citing the same authority
Records of other DIFC Courts decisions that cite at least one of the same instruments. Shared authority is not shared reasoning — each decision turns on its own facts.
- CFI 013/2009 — CFI 013/2009 - Default Judgment also cites Employment Law
- CFI 081/2026 — CFI 081/2026 Perrin v Pamula also cites Employment Law
- CFI 087/2025 — CFI 087/2025 Phenix v Patton also cites Employment Law
- SCT 060/2026 — Permelia v Prairie [2026] DIFC SCT 060 also cites Employment Law
- SCT 466/2025 — Perry v Paisleigh [2025] SCT 466 also cites Employment Law
- CFI 011/2026 — CFI 011/2026 Paul v Peyton also cites Employment Law
Primary source
Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.
Acting on a small claims tribunal matter
This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question SCT 006/2010 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.