Order With Reasons · Court of First Instance

CFI 087/2025 Phenix v Patton

A reference record of CFI 087/2025, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.

Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation

At a glance

Claim numberCFI 087/2025
CourtDIFC Courts — Court of First Instance
DecisionOrder With Reasons
BeforeH.E. Justice Rene Le Miere
Date12 October 2026
Date of issue12 October 2026
Operative orders8
Numbered paragraphs178
Recitals4

Parties to CFI 087/2025

As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.

PartyRole
PhenixClaimant
PattonDefendant

Decisions in CFI 087/2025

The DIFC Courts have published 3 decisions under this claim number. The dates and types below are the court's own record of the sequence.

DateType
2 July 2026Order
22 September 2026Order
12 October 2026Order

Sums named in the order with reasons

These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.

  • AED 6,055,627.57
  • USD 43,352
  • AED 9,452,122.52
  • AED 513,774.87
  • AED 3,305,250

Authorities cited in CFI 087/2025

The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.

Legislation and practice directions

Rules of the DIFC Courts applied

RDC 7.34, RDC 18.2, RDC 18.15, RDC 20.7, RDC 26.90 — see the RDC.

Records of other DIFC Courts decisions that cite at least one of the same instruments. Shared authority is not shared reasoning — each decision turns on its own facts.

  • SCT 060/2026 — Permelia v Prairie [2026] DIFC SCT 060 also cites Contract Law
  • SCT 073/2026 — Priscila v (1) Perline (2) Pompey [2026] DIFC SCT 073 also cites Contract Law
  • CFI 098/2026 — CFI 098/2026 Pierson v Percival also cites Contract Law
  • CA 006/2026 — CA 006/2026 (1) The Collection Club Restaurant Limited (2) Laurent B also cites Contract Law
  • CFI 054/2025 — CFI 054/2025 Innovative Production Group FZE v Innovation Factory Ro also cites Contract Law
  • CFI 009/2026 — CFI 009/2026 Osher v Ozmara also cites Contract Law

Primary source

Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.

  • CFI 087/2025 Phenix v Patton — the decision as published DIFC Courts
  • DIFC Courts judgments & orders — the register this decision is listed in DIFC Courts

Acting on a court of first instance matter

This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question CFI 087/2025 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.

Speak to us