Order · Court of First Instance
CFI 013/2009 - Default Judgment
A reference record of CFI 013/2009, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.
Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation
At a glance
| Claim number | CFI 013/2009 |
| Court | DIFC Courts — Court of First Instance |
| Decision | Order |
| Date | 25 June 2009 |
| Date of issue | 25 June 2009 |
| Operative orders | 0 |
| Numbered paragraphs | 14 |
| Recitals | 1 |
Parties to CFI 013/2009
As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.
| Party | Role |
|---|---|
| Leslie Woolaston | Claimant |
| Libertas Capital Limited | Defendant |
| Leslie Woolaston | Claimant |
| Libertas Capital Limited | Defendant |
Decisions in CFI 013/2009
The DIFC Courts have published 2 decisions under this claim number. The dates and types below are the court's own record of the sequence.
| Date | Type |
|---|---|
| 21 June 2009 | Order |
| 25 June 2009 | Order |
Sums named in the order
These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.
- AED 84275.14
Authorities cited in CFI 013/2009
The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.
Legislation and practice directions
- Employment Law DIFC law
Other decisions citing the same authority
Records of other DIFC Courts decisions that cite at least one of the same instruments. Shared authority is not shared reasoning — each decision turns on its own facts.
- CFI 081/2026 — CFI 081/2026 Perrin v Pamula also cites Employment Law
- CFI 087/2025 — CFI 087/2025 Phenix v Patton also cites Employment Law
- SCT 060/2026 — Permelia v Prairie [2026] DIFC SCT 060 also cites Employment Law
- SCT 466/2025 — Perry v Paisleigh [2025] SCT 466 also cites Employment Law
- CFI 011/2026 — CFI 011/2026 Paul v Peyton also cites Employment Law
- SCT 027/2026 — Parker v Penelope [2026] DIFC SCT 027 also cites Employment Law
Primary source
Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.
Acting on a court of first instance matter
This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question CFI 013/2009 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.