Judgment · Small Claims Tribunal

Omid v Orah [2025] DIFC SCT 011

A reference record of SCT 011/2025, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.

Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation

At a glance

Claim numberSCT 011/2025
CourtDIFC Courts — Small Claims Tribunal
DecisionJudgment
BeforeH.E. Justice Thomas Bathurst Ac Kc
Date22 October 2025
Date of issue22 October 2025
Operative orders2
Numbered paragraphs29
Recitals5

Parties to SCT 011/2025

As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.

PartyRole
OmidClaimant/Appellant
OrahDefendant/Respondent

Sums named in the judgment

These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.

  • USD 34,559.76
  • USD 16,078
  • AED 20,000
  • USD 12,727
  • USD 1,650
  • USD 20,122.76

Records of DIFC Courts decisions heard in the same division around the same time. This decision cites no instrument we hold a record of, so these are listed by division and date rather than by shared authority.

Primary source

Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.

  • Omid v Orah [2025] DIFC SCT 011 — the decision as published DIFC Courts
  • DIFC Courts judgments & orders — the register this decision is listed in DIFC Courts

Acting on a small claims tribunal matter

This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question SCT 011/2025 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.

Speak to us