Order With Reasons · Small Claims Tribunal
Nyla v Naomi Limited [2023] DIFC SCT 510
A reference record of SCT 510/2023, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.
Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation
At a glance
| Claim number | SCT 510/2023 |
| Court | DIFC Courts — Small Claims Tribunal |
| Decision | Order With Reasons |
| Before | Justice Andrew Moran |
| Date | 3 May 2024 |
| Date of issue | 3 May 2024 |
| Operative orders | 3 |
| Numbered paragraphs | 31 |
| Recitals | 4 |
Parties to SCT 510/2023
As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.
| Party | Role |
|---|---|
| Nyla | Claimant/Respondent |
| Naomi Limited | Defendant/Applicant |
Decisions in SCT 510/2023
The DIFC Courts have published 2 decisions under this claim number. The dates and types below are the court's own record of the sequence.
| Date | Type |
|---|---|
| 13 March 2024 | Judgment or Order |
| 3 May 2024 | Judgment or Order |
Sums named in the order with reasons
These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.
- AED 64,545.15
- AED 1,290.90
- AED 25,000
- AED 12,500
- AED 3,761.54
- AED 1,880.77
Authorities cited in SCT 510/2023
The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.
Legislation and practice directions
- DIFC Law No. 4 of 2020 DIFC law
- DIFC Law No. 4 of 2021 DIFC law
- DIFC Law No. 2 of 2022 DIFC law
- DIFC Law No. 1 of 2024 DIFC law
- Employment Law DIFC law
Rules of the DIFC Courts applied
RDC 4.2, RDC 53.89, RDC 53.91, RDC 53.107 — see the RDC.
Other decisions citing the same authority
Records of other DIFC Courts decisions that cite at least one of the same instruments. Shared authority is not shared reasoning — each decision turns on its own facts.
- SCT 440/2023 — Nohun v Netip [2023] DIFC SCT 440 also cites DIFC Law No. 4 of 2020
- SCT 443/2023 — Neve v Nellie [2023] DIFC SCT 443 also cites DIFC Law No. 4 of 2020
- SCT 383/2023 — Merut v Musort [2023] DIFC SCT 383 also cites DIFC Law No. 4 of 2020
- SCT 439/2022 — Mirti v Molip [2022] DIFC SCT 439 also cites DIFC Law No. 4 of 2020
- SCT 136/2022 — Lorenzo v Lilith Restaurant and Lounge [2022] DIFC SCT 136 also cites DIFC Law No. 4 of 2020
- SCT 108/2022 — Lamar v Luine [2022] DIFC SCT 108 also cites DIFC Law No. 4 of 2020
Primary source
Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.
Acting on a small claims tribunal matter
This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question SCT 510/2023 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.