Order With Reasons · Small Claims Tribunal
Nitai v Nicholson [2024] DIFC SCT 426
A reference record of SCT 426/2024, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.
Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation
At a glance
| Claim number | SCT 426/2024 |
| Court | DIFC Courts — Small Claims Tribunal |
| Decision | Order With Reasons |
| Before | Sct Judge Maitha Alshehhi |
| Date | 29 October 2024 |
| Date of issue | 29 October 2024 |
| Operative orders | 3 |
| Numbered paragraphs | 23 |
| Recitals | 5 |
Parties to SCT 426/2024
As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.
| Party | Role |
|---|---|
| Nitai | Claimant |
| Nicholson | Defendant |
Sums named in the order with reasons
These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.
- AED 52,500
- AED 500,000
- AED 1,000,000
Authorities cited in SCT 426/2024
The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.
Rules of the DIFC Courts applied
RDC 53.2 — see the RDC.
Other decisions of the same division
Records of DIFC Courts decisions heard in the same division around the same time. This decision cites no instrument we hold a record of, so these are listed by division and date rather than by shared authority.
- SCT 067/2022 — Lanakila v (1) Lang Represented By Its Manager Lancelot (2) Lancelot
- SCT 360/2021 — Machelm v Madge [2021] DIFC SCT 360
- SCT 062/2022 — Larue v (1) Lasharonrepresented By Its Manager Mr. Latrish (2) Lavad
- SCT 042/2022 — Langer v Laqueta [2022] DIFC SCT 042
- SCT 083/2022 — Lamong v Landrun [2022] DIFC SCT 083
- SCT 053/2022 — Lamis v Luthani [2022] DIFC SCT 053
Primary source
Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.
Acting on a small claims tribunal matter
This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question SCT 426/2024 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.