Order With Reasons · Small Claims Tribunal

Muraksa v Miblur [2023] DIFC SCT 438

A reference record of SCT 438/2023, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.

Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation

At a glance

Claim numberSCT 438/2023
CourtDIFC Courts — Small Claims Tribunal
DecisionOrder With Reasons
BeforeSct Judge And Assistant Registrar Hayley Norton
Date27 November 2023
Date of issue27 November 2023
Operative orders2
Numbered paragraphs11
Recitals3

Parties to SCT 438/2023

As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.

PartyRole
MuraksaClaimant
MiblurDefendant

Decisions in SCT 438/2023

The DIFC Courts have published 2 decisions under this claim number. The dates and types below are the court's own record of the sequence.

DateType
24 January 2023Judgment or Order
27 November 2023Judgment or Order

Sums named in the order with reasons

These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.

  • AED 5,536
  • AED 25,000

Records of DIFC Courts decisions heard in the same division around the same time. This decision cites no instrument we hold a record of, so these are listed by division and date rather than by shared authority.

Primary source

Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.

  • Muraksa v Miblur [2023] DIFC SCT 438 — the decision as published DIFC Courts
  • DIFC Courts judgments & orders — the register this decision is listed in DIFC Courts

Acting on a small claims tribunal matter

This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question SCT 438/2023 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.

Speak to us