NOURA LAWYERS
Speak with a partner

Judgment · Small Claims Tribunal

Deb v Decimus [2013] DIFC SCT 017

A reference record of SCT 017/2013, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.

Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation

At a glance

Claim numberSCT 017/2013
CourtDIFC Courts — Small Claims Tribunal
DecisionJudgment
BeforeH.E. Justice Shamlan Al Sawalehi
Date26 November 2013
Date of issue26 November 2013
Operative orders0
Numbered paragraphs11
Recitals2

Parties to SCT 017/2013

As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.

PartyRole
DebClaimant
DecimusDefendant

Sums named in the judgment

These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.

  • AED 3,200

Authorities cited in SCT 017/2013

The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.

Legislation and practice directions

Records of other DIFC Courts decisions that cite at least one of the same instruments. Shared authority is not shared reasoning — each decision turns on its own facts.

  • SCT 030/2013 — Carrick v Carrie [2013] DIFC SCT 030 also cites DIFC Law No. 4 of 2005
  • SCT 022/2013 — Dagmar v Dahlia [2013] DIFC SCT 022 also cites DIFC Law No. 4 of 2005
  • SCT 021/2013 — Dabria v Daire [2013] DIFC SCT 021 also cites DIFC Law No. 4 of 2005
  • SCT 013/2013 — Daewon v Dacia [2013] DIFC SCT 013 also cites DIFC Law No. 4 of 2005
  • CA 002/2022 — Expresso Telecom Group Ltd v Tarig H.A.G Rahamtalla [2022] DIFC CA 0 also cites DIFC Law No. 4 of 2005
  • CA 011/2021 — Musaab Tag Elsir Abdelsalam v Expresso Telecom Group [2021] DIFC CA also cites DIFC Law No. 4 of 2005

Primary source

Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.

  • Deb v Decimus [2013] DIFC SCT 017 — the decision as published DIFC Courts
  • DIFC Courts judgments & orders — the register this decision is listed in DIFC Courts

Acting on a small claims tribunal matter

This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question SCT 017/2013 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.

Speak to us