Judgment · Small Claims Tribunal

Miruya v Mahub [2022] DIFC SCT 414

A reference record of SCT 414/2022, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.

Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation

At a glance

Claim numberSCT 414/2022
CourtDIFC Courts — Small Claims Tribunal
DecisionJudgment
BeforeH.E. Justice Maha Al Mheiri
Date9 March 2023
Date of issue9 March 2023
Operative orders2
Numbered paragraphs29
Recitals4

Parties to SCT 414/2022

As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.

PartyRole
MiruyaClaimant
MahubDefendant

Sums named in the judgment

These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.

  • AED 31,534.94
  • AED 630.70
  • AED 3,000
  • AED 2,000
  • AED 1,000
  • AED 18,450

Authorities cited in SCT 414/2022

The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.

Legislation and practice directions

Rules of the DIFC Courts applied

RDC 53.61 — see the RDC.

Records of other DIFC Courts decisions that cite at least one of the same instruments. Shared authority is not shared reasoning — each decision turns on its own facts.

  • SCT 027/2023 — Mubin v Mikrun [2023] DIFC SCT 027 also cites DIFC Law No. 4 of 2021
  • SCT 417/2022 — Mibhut v Marto [2022] DIFC SCT 417 also cites DIFC Law No. 4 of 2021
  • SCT 408/2022 — Laia v Laredo Ltd [2022] DIFC SCT 408 also cites DIFC Law No. 4 of 2021
  • SCT 409/2022 — Leo v Leona [2022] DIFC SCT 409 also cites DIFC Law No. 4 of 2021
  • SCT 410/2022 — Leah v Legacy Ltd [2022] DIFC SCT 410 also cites DIFC Law No. 4 of 2021
  • SCT 383/2022 — Luftin v Lahire [2022] SCT 383 also cites DIFC Law No. 4 of 2021

Primary source

Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.

  • Miruya v Mahub [2022] DIFC SCT 414 — the decision as published DIFC Courts
  • DIFC Courts judgments & orders — the register this decision is listed in DIFC Courts

Acting on a small claims tribunal matter

This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question SCT 414/2022 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.

Speak to us