Judgment · Small Claims Tribunal

Meper v Mosup [2023] DIFC SCT 101

A reference record of SCT 101/2023, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.

Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation

At a glance

Claim numberSCT 101/2023
CourtDIFC Courts — Small Claims Tribunal
DecisionJudgment
BeforeH.E. Justice Nassir Al Nasser
Date2 May 2023
Date of issue2 May 2023
Operative orders4
Numbered paragraphs26
Recitals2

Parties to SCT 101/2023

As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.

PartyRole
MeperClaimant/Defendant In Counterclaim
MosupDefendant/Claimant In Counterclaim

Sums named in the judgment

These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.

  • AED 5,000
  • AED 367.50
  • AED 11,667
  • AED 47,619
  • AED 33,333
  • AED 45,000

Records of DIFC Courts decisions heard in the same division around the same time. This decision cites no instrument we hold a record of, so these are listed by division and date rather than by shared authority.

Primary source

Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.

  • Meper v Mosup [2023] DIFC SCT 101 — the decision as published DIFC Courts
  • DIFC Courts judgments & orders — the register this decision is listed in DIFC Courts

Acting on a small claims tribunal matter

This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question SCT 101/2023 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.

Speak to us