Judgment · Small Claims Tribunal

Moasa v Murit [2023] DIFC SCT 163

A reference record of SCT 163/2023, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.

Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation

At a glance

Claim numberSCT 163/2023
CourtDIFC Courts — Small Claims Tribunal
DecisionJudgment
BeforeH.E. Justice Maha Al Mheiri
Date24 May 2023
Operative orders2
Numbered paragraphs17
Recitals3

Parties to SCT 163/2023

As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.

PartyRole
MoasaClaimant
MuritDefendant

Sums named in the judgment

These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.

  • AED 130,000
  • AED 21,666

Authorities cited in SCT 163/2023

The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.

Legislation and practice directions

Records of other DIFC Courts decisions that cite at least one of the same instruments. Shared authority is not shared reasoning — each decision turns on its own facts.

  • SCT 265/2022 — Lihant v Liqt [2022] DIFC SCT 265 also cites Leasing Law
  • SCT 357/2022 — Litaf v Ledart [2022] DIFC SCT 357 also cites Leasing Law
  • SCT 342/2022 — Limone v Livat [2022] DIFC SCT 342 also cites Leasing Law
  • SCT 290/2022 — Leelans v Lontas [2022] DIFC SCT 290 also cites Leasing Law
  • SCT 120/2022 — Lyric v Lucian [2022] DIFC SCT 120 also cites Leasing Law
  • SCT 024/2022 — (1) Liston (2) Lafti v Laet [2022] DIFC SCT 024 also cites Leasing Law

Primary source

Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.

  • Moasa v Murit [2023] DIFC SCT 163 — the decision as published DIFC Courts
  • DIFC Courts judgments & orders — the register this decision is listed in DIFC Courts

Acting on a small claims tribunal matter

This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question SCT 163/2023 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.

Speak to us