Judgment · Small Claims Tribunal

Likhil v (1) Lakshin (2) Laabh [2021] DIFC SCT 322

A reference record of SCT 322/2021, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.

Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation

At a glance

Claim numberSCT 322/2021
CourtDIFC Courts — Small Claims Tribunal
DecisionJudgment
BeforeH.E. Justice Nassir Al Nasser
Date28 December 2021
Date of issue28 December 2021
Operative orders3
Numbered paragraphs34
Recitals2

Parties to SCT 322/2021

As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.

PartyRole
LikhilClaimant/Defendant In Counterclaim
(2) LaabhDefendants/Claimants In Counterclaim

Sums named in the judgment

These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.

  • AED 40,000
  • AED 2,000
  • USD 9,450
  • AED 20,000
  • USD 100
  • USD 315,000

Records of DIFC Courts decisions heard in the same division around the same time. This decision cites no instrument we hold a record of, so these are listed by division and date rather than by shared authority.

Primary source

Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.

  • Likhil v (1) Lakshin (2) Laabh [2021] DIFC SCT 322 — the decision as published DIFC Courts
  • DIFC Courts judgments & orders — the register this decision is listed in DIFC Courts

Acting on a small claims tribunal matter

This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question SCT 322/2021 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.

Speak to us