Order With Reasons · Small Claims Tribunal
Mipil v (1) Miwert (2) Merob [2023] DIFC SCT 223
A reference record of SCT 223/2023, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.
Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation
At a glance
| Claim number | SCT 223/2023 |
| Court | DIFC Courts — Small Claims Tribunal |
| Decision | Order With Reasons |
| Before | H.E. Deputy Chief Justice Ali Al Madhani |
| Date | 12 October 2023 |
| Date of issue | 10 October 2023 |
| Operative orders | 3 |
| Numbered paragraphs | 33 |
| Recitals | 5 |
Parties to SCT 223/2023
As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.
| Party | Role |
|---|---|
| Mipil | Claimant/Appellant |
| (2) Merob | Defendants/Respondents |
Decisions in SCT 223/2023
The DIFC Courts have published 2 decisions under this claim number. The dates and types below are the court's own record of the sequence.
| Date | Type |
|---|---|
| 11 August 2023 | Judgment or Order |
| 12 October 2023 | Judgment or Order |
Sums named in the order with reasons
These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.
- AED 68,634
- AED 27,000
- AED 35,000
- AED 9,000
Authorities cited in SCT 223/2023
The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.
Legislation and practice directions
- Contract Law DIFC law
Rules of the DIFC Courts applied
RDC 53.91 — see the RDC.
Other decisions citing the same authority
Records of other DIFC Courts decisions that cite at least one of the same instruments. Shared authority is not shared reasoning — each decision turns on its own facts.
- CFI 077/2021 — Eshraq Investments PJSC v Shehab M. Gargash & Others [2021] DIFC CFI also cites Contract Law
- SCT 180/2023 — Meket v Mlat [2023] DIFC SCT 180 also cites Contract Law
- SCT 440/2022 — Murak v Moran [2022] DIFC SCT 440 also cites Contract Law
- SCT 467/2022 — Miucit v Mahab [2022] DIFC SCT 467 also cites Contract Law
- SCT 406/2022 — Liv v Lava Ltd [2022] DIFC SCT 406 also cites Contract Law
- SCT 265/2022 — Lihant v Liqt [2022] DIFC SCT 265 also cites Contract Law
Primary source
Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.
Acting on a small claims tribunal matter
This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question SCT 223/2023 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.