Judgment · Small Claims Tribunal
Lashanda v Laune [2021] DIFC SCT 216
A reference record of SCT 216/2021, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.
Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation
At a glance
| Claim number | SCT 216/2021 |
| Court | DIFC Courts — Small Claims Tribunal |
| Decision | Judgment |
| Before | H.E Justice Nassir Al Nasser |
| Date | 17 August 2021 |
| Date of issue | 17 August 2021 |
| Operative orders | 3 |
| Numbered paragraphs | 43 |
| Recitals | 3 |
Parties to SCT 216/2021
As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.
| Party | Role |
|---|---|
| Lashanda | Claimant |
| Laune | Defendant |
Sums named in the judgment
These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.
- AED 187,454.54
- AED 3,749.09
- AED 199,382
- AED 17,000
- AED 10,000
- AED 5,000
Authorities cited in SCT 216/2021
The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.
Legislation and practice directions
- DIFC Law No. 2 of 2019 DIFC law
- DIFC Law No. 4 of 2020 DIFC law
- Employment Law DIFC law
- Practice Direction No. 4 of 2017 Practice Direction
Other decisions citing the same authority
Records of other DIFC Courts decisions that cite at least one of the same instruments. Shared authority is not shared reasoning — each decision turns on its own facts.
- SCT 199/2021 — Leatrix v Lebron [2021] DIFC SCT 199 also cites DIFC Law No. 2 of 2019
- SCT 168/2021 — Laboni v Lahit [2021] DIFC SCT 168 also cites DIFC Law No. 2 of 2019
- SCT 154/2021 — Laird v Lamis [2021] DIFC SCT 154 also cites DIFC Law No. 2 of 2019
- SCT 093/2021 — Lalit v Leya [2021] DIFC SCT 093 also cites DIFC Law No. 2 of 2019
- SCT 016/2021 — Madonna v Mael Investments Limited [2021] DIFC SCT 016 also cites DIFC Law No. 2 of 2019
- SCT 031/2021 — Madrid v Maeko [2021] DIFC SCT 031 also cites DIFC Law No. 2 of 2019
Primary source
Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.
Acting on a small claims tribunal matter
This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question SCT 216/2021 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.