Judgment · Small Claims Tribunal

Madonna v Mael Investments Limited [2021] DIFC SCT 016

A reference record of SCT 016/2021, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.

Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation

At a glance

Claim numberSCT 016/2021
CourtDIFC Courts — Small Claims Tribunal
DecisionJudgment
BeforeH.E. Justice Nassir Al Nasser
Date2 March 2021
Date of issue2 March 2021
Operative orders2
Numbered paragraphs53
Recitals3

Parties to SCT 016/2021

As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.

PartyRole
MadonnaClaimant
Mael Investments LimitedDefendant

Sums named in the judgment

These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.

  • AED 32,178.36
  • AED 643.56
  • AED 500,000
  • AED 420,000
  • AED 70,000
  • AED 26,856.99

Authorities cited in SCT 016/2021

The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.

Legislation and practice directions

  • DIFC Law No. 2 of 2019 DIFC law
  • DIFC Law No. 4 of 2020 DIFC law
  • Employment Law DIFC law

Records of other DIFC Courts decisions that cite at least one of the same instruments. Shared authority is not shared reasoning — each decision turns on its own facts.

  • SCT 031/2021 — Madrid v Maeko [2021] DIFC SCT 031 also cites DIFC Law No. 2 of 2019
  • SCT 380/2020 — Maci v Magnus Limited [2020] DIFC SCT 380 also cites DIFC Law No. 2 of 2019
  • SCT 381/2020 — Michael v Mattida [2020] DIFC SCT 381 also cites DIFC Law No. 2 of 2019
  • SCT 355/2020 — Maria v Mouna [2020] DIFC SCT 355 also cites DIFC Law No. 2 of 2019
  • CFI 052/2020 — Lucila v Linkalinka [2020] DIFC CFI 052 also cites DIFC Law No. 2 of 2019
  • SCT 284/2020 — Liam v Luke Restaurant And Bar Limited [2020] DIFC SCT 284 also cites DIFC Law No. 2 of 2019

Primary source

Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.

  • Madonna v Mael Investments Limited [2021] DIFC SCT 016 — the decision as published DIFC Courts
  • DIFC Courts judgments & orders — the register this decision is listed in DIFC Courts

Acting on a small claims tribunal matter

This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question SCT 016/2021 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.

Speak to us