Judgment · Small Claims Tribunal
Lamont v Lapis [2022] DIFC SCT 327
A reference record of SCT 327/2022, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.
Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation
At a glance
| Claim number | SCT 327/2022 |
| Court | DIFC Courts — Small Claims Tribunal |
| Decision | Judgment |
| Before | H.E. Justice Maha Al Mheiri |
| Date | 13 October 2022 |
| Date of issue | 13 October 2022 |
| Operative orders | 4 |
| Numbered paragraphs | 41 |
| Recitals | 3 |
Parties to SCT 327/2022
As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.
| Party | Role |
|---|---|
| Lamont | Claimant |
| Lapis | Defendant |
Sums named in the judgment
These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.
- AED 33,748.43
- AED 674.97
- AED 6,000
- AED 4,000
- AED 2,000
- AED 2,600
Authorities cited in SCT 327/2022
The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.
Legislation and practice directions
- DIFC Law No. 4 of 2021 DIFC law
- Employment Law DIFC law
Other decisions citing the same authority
Records of other DIFC Courts decisions that cite at least one of the same instruments. Shared authority is not shared reasoning — each decision turns on its own facts.
- SCT 322/2022 — Licia v Liesma [2022] DIFC SCT 322 also cites DIFC Law No. 4 of 2021
- SCT 273/2022 — Lumsa v Lactin [2022] DIFC SCT 273 also cites DIFC Law No. 4 of 2021
- SCT 294/2022 — Luftu v Literi [2022] DIFC SCT 294 also cites DIFC Law No. 4 of 2021
- SCT 255/2022 — Mivte v Madie [2022] DIFC SCT 255 also cites DIFC Law No. 4 of 2021
- SCT 459/2024 — Negrete v Nazli [2024] DIFC SCT 459 also cites DIFC Law No. 4 of 2021
- SCT 365/2024 — Nuruddin v Nihaal [2024] DIFC SCT 365 also cites DIFC Law No. 4 of 2021
Primary source
Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.
Acting on a small claims tribunal matter
This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question SCT 327/2022 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.