Judgment · Small Claims Tribunal
Licia v Liesma [2022] DIFC SCT 322
A reference record of SCT 322/2022, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.
Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation
At a glance
| Claim number | SCT 322/2022 |
| Court | DIFC Courts — Small Claims Tribunal |
| Decision | Judgment |
| Before | H.E. Justice Maha Al Mheiri |
| Date | 12 October 2022 |
| Date of issue | 12 October 2022 |
| Operative orders | 2 |
| Numbered paragraphs | 34 |
| Recitals | 3 |
Parties to SCT 322/2022
As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.
| Party | Role |
|---|---|
| Licia | Claimant |
| Liesma | Defendant |
Sums named in the judgment
These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.
- AED 60,280
- AED 12,000.00
- AED 36,000
- AED 20,000
- AED 500,000
Authorities cited in SCT 322/2022
The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.
Legislation and practice directions
- DIFC Law No. 6 of 2004 DIFC law
- DIFC Law No. 4 of 2021 DIFC law
- Contract Law DIFC law
- Employment Law DIFC law
Other decisions citing the same authority
Records of other DIFC Courts decisions that cite at least one of the same instruments. Shared authority is not shared reasoning — each decision turns on its own facts.
- SCT 117/2022 — Maalik Investments Limited v (1) Mabili Interior Decoration Design L also cites DIFC Law No. 6 of 2004
- SCT 053/2022 — Lamis v Luthani [2022] DIFC SCT 053 also cites DIFC Law No. 6 of 2004
- SCT 015/2022 — Mahina v (1) Mahfuz (2) Mahendra [2022] DIFC SCT 015 also cites DIFC Law No. 6 of 2004
- CFI 073/2021 — Mason v Madison [2021] DIFC CFI 073 also cites DIFC Law No. 6 of 2004
- CFI 032/2020 — CFI 032/2020 Kaamil v (1) Kaawa (2) Kaabii (3) Kadija (4) Kaemon (5) also cites DIFC Law No. 6 of 2004
- CA 011/2021 — Musaab Tag Elsir Abdelsalam v Expresso Telecom Group [2021] DIFC CA also cites DIFC Law No. 6 of 2004
Primary source
Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.
Acting on a small claims tribunal matter
This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question SCT 322/2022 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.